miz1q2w3e said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
miz1q2w3e said: I agree, just make new threads for news and discussion I rarely enter those "official" threads because of what you said in the OP |
Apparently you haven't been in the official bioshock thread. the thread title is always reflected in the op, and not page 5. it's all about convenance.
the post that were in the op are moved to view post, in a post reserved for that content, that way everything stays on the front page. it's a little more work, but it's organized, in order, and not hard to find.
|
That sounds better, but the comments and discussions are still harder to lookup
It might be slightly better for threads discussing specific games but it's still really annoying in news thread, like the official Nintendo news thread for example, I remember that one was a real mess (sorry ryan)
|
see i can agree with that. if you'll notice, all the threads listed in my sig, have all been updated, with info related to those games. i figure, why make another thread when i can simply update one i made 2 days ago.
MUGEN, and Ryan in the early part of there respective threads i told this, and neither followed up on my advice, even when Seece commented about the content of a title change in the official Vita thread not being in the op.
even if it's on the last page of the thread. it's much easier and convenient to post/make available in the op.
official game related threads are much different then a news thread, cause news threads can last forever while official game related threads will last about 4 months depending on when they'er made.
i can't say i have mush advice on news threads , other then saying, know when the thread has run its course, have it locked, and post the link to the locked thread in the op of the new one and carry on from their.
it's common sense. no need to drag a thread over filled with content past its death.