I can't be bothered to re-quote everything as it will turn into a mega quote thread.
But I will respond to your "cherry picking" thing. In light of that report I find it very ironic that you would say I was cherry picking when you picked the one positive while ignoring the rest of the report which was very damning.
For example you ignored these from that report
"The likelihood of a strong recovery in Sony's earnings is low, due to a massive erosion of prices, falling demand, and harsh competition."
"The outlook on the long-term corporate credit rating is negative. We base the downgrade on our view that severe circumstances in Sony's mainstay electronics businesses make a strong recovery in earnings unlikely"
"Standard & Poor's believes the major reason for the extended losses is Sony's strategy to aggressively expand its global market share despite strong competition, a massive erosion of prices, and its high cost structure compared with overseas competion" (not the flood then?)
"Massive pressure on the prices of Sony's key products, such as flat-panel TVs and mobile handsets, is likely to continue, and the company's position in the global market is under strong pressure amid severe competition from Korean manufacturers and emerging Chinese companies"
"circumstances are so severe that Standard & Poor's believes it will be difficult for Sony to return its TV business to profitability even in fiscal 2013. Therefore, we see a low likelihood of a strong recovery in Sony's earnings in the next two years or so."
"Because of continuing net losses since fiscal 2008, Sony's profitability looks significantly weaker than that of its global industry peers"
"Standard & Poor's also believes Sony's adjusted total debt to capital (excluding finance operations) will rise to around 40% as of March 31, 2012, from 35% a year earlier."
Then to the bit which contradicts your own quote
"We expect strong price erosion and a fall in demand may delay a recovery in earnings in the company's TV segment and lead to further expenses in restructuring."
and the killer blow
"To consider upgrading the company, we would need to see Sony stabilize earnings in its core businesses and show stronger prospects for financial improvement. Given the severity of the business environment, though, we consider the possibility of such an outcome low at present."
So as a cherry picker I really picked the best one didn't I.....
As for the bonds thing again that is quite ironic that you would spin that in a positive way when they were basically forced to do that to repay the debts they have not been paying. You make it sound like they did it through choice.
But either way they can't afford to pay their debts let alone potentially foot the bill of lowering the Vita's price.
As I said can wrap it up and call it what you like, can believe and interprut it in whichever way you like. But Sony as a company are in deep financial shit. It will be interesting to see the next quarter results because it won't have none of the things you used as an excuse. But i'm sure your find one.









