TruckOSaurus said:
Sal.Paradise said:
TruckOSaurus said:
Ajescent said:
d21lewis said: I didn't say it mentioned the PS3. People just seem to think they can play Vita vs. PS3. Even in some other threads on this site, people think they'll be playing Call of Duty Vita vs. Call of Duty on the PS3. Who knows? Maybe they will. One thing I do know--Marvel vs. Capcom 3 is advertised as a "Cross platform game". How do I know? Because, as soon as I purchased the Vita version, I googled it and saw mention that people that purchased the PS3 version would get the Vita version for free. I was pissed beyond belief! Then, I did a little more research. Turns out, you don't get the Vita version for free. You can't play vs PS3 players, either. What they meant was that, if you purchase DLC on the PS3 version, you get the same DLC on the Vita version. That's your Cross Platform right there. Awesome, eh? |
One could argue that's once again people not doing their research properly and not reading between the lines.
|
Yes, dishonest people could argue that.
|
Sorry? Dishonest? Please explain.
Sony very clearly stated in their press release ( http://blog.us.playstation.com/2012/02/16/3-great-reasons-to-try-ps-vitaps3-cross-play-content/ ) that "DLC purchased for the PS3 version of Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 can be used on the PS Vita version for free (and vice versa)."
Tell me how this is misleading in any way, shape or form.
|
Calling shared DLC, cross platform gaming is definitely stretching the truth. Not everybody reads press releases (very few people do actually) and like I said I'm very uninformed when it comes to the Vita but if someone who frequents a gaming web site and is interested in the Vita like d21lewis can be misled by it then you can bet a lot of people will make the same false assumptions.
|
They called it 'Cross Play Content' which is a factual description of what it is: content that you can play on both platforms. They then stated exactly that it is DLC that can be shared across the two versions of the game.
So you don't read the official press release, and then you claim that Sony is misleading people? You're blaming Sony because what you've read from OTHER forum posts or OTHER gaming blogs isn't clear enough? If you can be so misled so easily I think the problem is two-fold.
1. You don't check up the facts before your purchase, so you don't know what you're getting. Your fault.
2. Reporting of the 'cross play content' was innacurate, despite the official release being absolutely clear. The blogs/users fault.
(Although on the 3 sites where read about this press release, they all clearly mentioned that UMVC3 was only sharing dlc.)
Either way, blaming Sony is just wrong.