Wonktonodi said: And TOS Wonk's indictment of Noctis was pretty powerful IMO, I'd lynch him as readily as moreno, but moreno already has the votes. Vote morenoingrato Sorry for the lateness of my reply I didn't know out mod was taking sides

Yeah, yeah, your avatars are both some pretty boy, a little brain fart is understandable

Final-Fan said: Wonktonodi said: And TOS Wonk's indictment of Noctis was pretty powerful IMO, I'd lynch him as readily as moreno, but moreno already has the votes. Vote morenoingrato Sorry for the lateness of my reply I didn't know out mod was taking sides Yeah, yeah, your avatars are both some pretty boy, a little brain fart is understandable

I should have had this avatar sooner

Certainly it isn't, but I didn't feel strongly enough yet to vote you, nor did the case seem strong enough(everyone else ignoring it) to gain reactions from others. I know that it's going to be like pulling teeth to get certain people to vote, so the timing has to be right.

As for my change in ranking? I freely admit that while I interpret many of your actions in a scummy light, they could actually be explained if you're town. My original case against moreno was the two posts that I couldn't make sense of. Nobody has yet to refute even that, so while I felt worse about you, the evidence against moreno was more damning.  Thus pushing his lynch gives me more info. moreno being the odd man out in the name/unnamed debate was the perfect bait to see if anyone else would simply latch onto that rather than something more substantial. The kind of trap that if nobody takes it the only downside is it could make me look bad for looking like I was relying on setup meta.(and even then it's really a plus since that wasn't the case. A trap within a trap!) When the only things that happened were your very shady unvote and prof realising he didn't vote, I wondered if you two were trying to deflect the situation after all of that. I was giddy in thinking I caught the whole scumteam day one and went back to analyze the crap out of your(collectively) posts.

Timestamping is a bitch, but note the post ids:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4442048 Order is Stefl, moreno, prof
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4442414 More digging into moreno. At this point I can't even make leaps of faith in my mind to try to explain moreno's actions as town. My stance on you hasn't changed, he's just gone higher up the scumspect list.

You are not the top suspect because of the wrong theory based on a wrong assumption. That is actually the ONLY thing I would expect from you if you were telling the truth. This is why you are the top suspect. Humor me and try to explain either of those posts if you are what you say you are.

Oh, btw I didn't actually believe he was going "on and on" about Cave Johnson. I just wanted Radish to think he had made a mistake talking about it.

This strikes me oddly. I don't think you've given an opinion on moreno yourself. I know what moreno has to do to best shed the votes,(part of which seems impossible to me) but you're giving off the sense you think he is town. As a major voice, you could defend him yourself, yet you aren't. Why?

1. I fail to see how "Homeless Test Subject" makes him town even if it is true. That's where I disagree with radish/Wonk. Still lean desperate fakeclaim that he was forced into based on the OP though.

2. I may be muddling it, but that's actually a fair point. radish has been chided as town so many times for countervoting, one would think he'd be very concious to avoid it as town.

3. Since remembering it, I know exactly what the third thing is and have never forgotten it. If you're looking for it, the post smells of fishing for characters to me, either for the purpose of a safeclaim or likely figuring out someone's role.

Excuse me for my rudeness: are you here to play or observe?

To the untrained eye. I think most of the veterans have come to see more positives and cons in it, ie, getting people to talk, seeing how people reinforce the vote, parroting, etc etc.

I don't lynch everyone I interrogate. He did get freaked out and say something stupid. But did we continue to lynch him? No. Instead we moved on without even asking for a claim.

You on the other hand, and trying to paint me like a liability.

There's just one question. When you say "assuming he is town, you would have sabotaged a town player by your own trickery", how is it that you've managed to know I'm town? What if I was mafia, and the whole POINT was to mislynch him? No, no, you didn't even think of that, did you? Because you know I'm town...right? Why do you know that?

Hmmm. I was thinking of posting something similar. That it wasn't overly towny, but not scummy either. I know a town prof would do that for at least two obvious reasons depending on his thoughts, but it's also easy for scum prof to manipulate the situation. As you say, it's pretty much how the vets play. Happy I waited to see if you would defend yourself.

That does make twice now that spurge has implied knowledge of others being town.