By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - David Jaffe responds to G4TV’s Twisted Metal review

when it's all said and done, all this shit = more sell



Bet reminder: I bet with Tboned51 that Splatoon won't reach the 1 million shipped mark by the end of 2015. I win if he loses and I lose if I lost.

Around the Network
chapset said:
when it's all said and done, all this shit = more sell


Then TM will be a 5 million seller?



mike_intellivision said:
I think this point out there are a lot of immature people associated with video gaming -- designers, reviewers, players.

That may be one reason why video gaming is not taken seriously by so many people.

Mike from Morgantown


When a majority of the gaming population that is vocal on the internet is under 18, they don't really put a good light on the entire gaming community. 



M.U.G.E.N said:

elitist? do you just randomly pick up these words or something? Not trying to make you feel shitty but if you do..not sure what to tell ya

you make a stupid statement saying I love everything sony and I point how full of shit you are and now you are acting victim here? How does that even make sense. You clearly don't know me well enough. If you can't take a critic of your action then ..you ARE wasting my time. I sincerely pointed how the game plays well and you had to come back at it with a snide and ill informed remark. Accept the positive feedback from those who have actually played the game. I even gave you other places you can look up such information. before pointing the finger at others might I suggest you do the same to yourself first? The one who is having a meltdown here is you, so I take you take some time off..and actually know what you are talking about next time.

 

ps: If I knew you were padib I would haven't even bothered...I avoided you back then for good reasons and would have now as well..will do so from now. Good day

You're so pointless.



happydolphin said:
pezus said:

Really, seeing a post like this from a gamer that primarily plays on Nintendo consoles (as far as I know) is baffling. Which matters more, fun gameplay or realistic physics?

And motion blur?? What the heck does that improve? Does Mario Kart have advanced physics? No, it doesn't. Is it still great fun? Yes, it is.

my last post was for prof and mugen, not you p. 

I'm not your typical Ninty fan. There are others out there like me that enjoy a level of realism and graphics, as long as it doesn't affect gameplay. If the game is fun and the flawed physics (in my opinion) are tolerable, then good. I'll have to play it despite my turn-off. But as I said pezus, it's really just my opinion. I don't know what got into prof and M.U.G.E.N. to jump me.


non realistic physics =/= flawed physics.

this isnt a driving simulator, having realistic physics would be retarded and terrible in this game. most games arent suited for realistic physics, being able to turn on a dime, and do unrealistic driving manovours is an integral part of this game, nothing about the physics are dated, in fact im sure there are very modern, just not realistic.

you created your account a month ago, you already have over 800 posts (which is insane) you seem to be a nintendo only gamer, yet you always seem to have very ignorant opinions on all things Sony (ignorant because it comes from somebody who hasnt played the things they are talking about). You seem to post, just to post. there seems to be no reason behind the things you say. you say this game is dated, because it doesnt have realistic physics, enough motion blur, or realistic drifting... this isnt Gran Turismo, that kind of stuff would make no sense in this game, nor would it in Mario Kart, hence why its absent from there as well. 90%+ of your posts some pointless. you want Sony to make less games, even though it would benefit you in no way, you make opinions on games you dont/havent played...

but more importantly...

WHO ARE YOU?



Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
sethnintendo said:
mike_intellivision said:
I think this point out there are a lot of immature people associated with video gaming -- designers, reviewers, players.

That may be one reason why video gaming is not taken seriously by so many people.

Mike from Morgantown

When a majority of the gaming population that is vocal on the internet is under 18, they don't really put a good light on the entire gaming community. 

The worrisome thing is that the majority actually might not be under 18.

That actually is a little scary.



M.U.G.E.N said:
happydolphin said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
happydolphin said:
What's wrong with you two? Look, if you think it's a waste of time, man, there's nothing I can do about that. I offered points you don't agree with. I haven't played the game, M.U.G.E.N. has. I'm just gonna drop it because you are bullish, sorry. Have fun petting each other.


bullish? :S the heck..the only reason I even got annoyed is because someone who joined this site this year is telling how I react to all things sony..ffs I don't even go YAY for everything vita and I am one of its biggest fans here

blah w/e waste of my time

I've had enough of your elitist crap. If you think we or I'm a waste of time, just go somewhere else. DAMNIT.

Then people complain that this place is too serious, louzy, on and on.

If you don't have the patience to post here, stop making us feel shitty and migrate. Look, I do like you, but this has got to stop. Vgchartz isn't a place for people to feel like shit because they express their tastes, their opinions and offer reasons for them. If you think I'm a waste of time, then just go. I don't want you to, but I can't help your attitude.

Seriously.

elitist? do you just randomly pick up these words or something? Not trying to make you feel shitty but if you do..not sure what to tell ya

you make a stupid statement saying I love everything sony and I point how full of shit you are and now you are acting victim here? How does that even make sense. You clearly don't know me well enough. If you can't take a critic of your action then ..you ARE wasting my time. I sincerely pointed how the game plays well and you had to come back at it with a snide and ill informed remark. Accept the positive feedback from those who have actually played the game. I even gave you other places you can look up such information. before pointing the finger at others might I suggest you do the same to yourself first? The one who is having a meltdown here is you, so I take you take some time off..and actually know what you are talking about next time.

 

ps: If I knew you were padib I would haven't even bothered...I avoided you back then for good reasons and would have now as well..will do so from now. Good day

i never really noticed padib, i saw his his name a few times, never really noticed his posts. was he as annoying interesting of poster as happy is?

happy seems to go into lots of sony threads, just simply to post? did padib do this?



osamanobama said:

non realistic physics =/= flawed physics.

this isnt a driving simulator, having realistic physics would be retarded and terrible in this game. most games arent suited for realistic physics, being able to turn on a dime, and do unrealistic driving manovours is an integral part of this game, nothing about the physics are dated, in fact im sure there are very modern, just not realistic.

you created your account a month ago, you already have over 800 posts (which is insane) you seem to be a nintendo only gamer, yet you always seem to have very ignorant opinions on all things Sony (ignorant because it comes from somebody who hasnt played the things they are talking about). You seem to post, just to post. there seems to be no reason behind the things you say. you say this game is dated, because it doesnt have realistic physics, enough motion blur, or realistic drifting... this isnt Gran Turismo, that kind of stuff would make no sense in this game, nor would it in Mario Kart, hence why its absent from there as well. 90%+ of your posts some pointless. you want Sony to make less games, even though it would benefit you in no way, you make opinions on games you dont/havent played...

but more importantly...

WHO ARE YOU?

What does this have to do with anything? If you have qtn, just PM me.

But I'll answer. I almost always thoroughly research my posts and only talk on my experience (to its limit). TM came out yesterday in the US. I was talking given the video in the review and read it carefully. Since you shared your opinion, what experience do you have with TM? Just curious.

I am not a Nintendo only gamer. I own a 3DS and a PS2. I am a fan of Nintendo, Blizzard, Square, Capcom, Konami, Namco, and Sony. I don't like all the games these ppl make, and feel comfortable voicing my opinion because I know I'm not a troll. I say things as I see them.

The fact that I'm asked these questions is not a good thing, the fact that I was ganged up on is not a good thing. Then you wonder why this place isn't fun. My name is padib. For the record, I wonder how much opinion you've emitted on games you haven't plaeyed. I simply cannot afford all consoles and games, certainly not new releases very easily. It would be better if you judged me rather on the content of my posts. For instance, in the "Sony should make less games" thread, I don't see how I was being unreasonable, and many Sony fans seemed to agree with me (even one here who ganged up on me and hinted I was trolling).

I don't mind unrealistic physics. These, on the other hand, (unless my eyes fail me) seem either incomplete or overly simplistic. Thanks for listening.



theprof00 said:
sales2099 said:
"Finally, give it a rest with the "G4 is biased against Sony" or "paid off by Microsoft"

Oh God yes, was I happy to see someone acknowledge this. Any PS3 exclusive gets less then perfect.....and all the fans cry bias and MS moneyhatting. Oh but when a 360 games scores low.....it was well deserved right?

Cry me a river/gimme a break. Just one of the cultural differences between a 360 and PS3 fan

This was not a less than perfect.

He blasted the game for being, basically, Twisted Metal.

He says there has been no evolution, yet points out that you can now change cars mid map, he also fails to point out how easy they've made the special ablities. Specials used to be left, right, up, or up,down,left,right, etc. Now, it's either up, down, left, or right, each activating a different special. They simplified the entire control mechanic, and even included a new sniping mechanic. The game is incredibly balanced to what it used to be where the best cars were almost always the biggest. Now, each vehicle size category has a unique way to play. No longer is it just, spawn camp the power missiles, or spawn camp the barrels. Each car has a unique way to play.

He blasts it for being pinball-like in the physics. That's the point. These are cars you're chasing, not people. If you can't bounce a car, or dislodge it, you're not going to catch it.

Yeah, no evolution indeed. The reviewer scored the game for being an old franchise. And he praises rage for it's modernity? Please, rage is not a good game. It's slow, and it's boring. There's no flavor or substance or style. It's sooo vanilla.


So you blast the reviewer for being "biased" but at the same time are the same way concerning Rage. What are you supposed to be, the pinnacle of objectivity? Of course reviews are biased to the opinion of the reviewer. It is the nature of reviews.



themanwithnoname's law: As an America's sales or NPD thread grows longer, the probabilty of the comment "America = World" [sarcasticly] being made approaches 1.

happydolphin said:
osamanobama said:

non realistic physics =/= flawed physics.

this isnt a driving simulator, having realistic physics would be retarded and terrible in this game. most games arent suited for realistic physics, being able to turn on a dime, and do unrealistic driving manovours is an integral part of this game, nothing about the physics are dated, in fact im sure there are very modern, just not realistic.

you created your account a month ago, you already have over 800 posts (which is insane) you seem to be a nintendo only gamer, yet you always seem to have very ignorant opinions on all things Sony (ignorant because it comes from somebody who hasnt played the things they are talking about). You seem to post, just to post. there seems to be no reason behind the things you say. you say this game is dated, because it doesnt have realistic physics, enough motion blur, or realistic drifting... this isnt Gran Turismo, that kind of stuff would make no sense in this game, nor would it in Mario Kart, hence why its absent from there as well. 90%+ of your posts some pointless. you want Sony to make less games, even though it would benefit you in no way, you make opinions on games you dont/havent played...

but more importantly...

WHO ARE YOU?

What does this have to do with anything? If you have qtn, just PM me.

But I'll answer. I almost always thoroughly research my posts and only talk on my experience (to its limit). TM came out yesterday in the US. I was talking given the video in the review and read it carefully. Since you shared your opinion, what experience do you have with TM? Just curious.

I am not a Nintendo only gamer. I own a 3DS and a PS2. I am a fan of Nintendo, Blizzard, Square, Capcom, Konami, Namco, and Sony. I don't like all the games these ppl make, and feel comfortable voicing my opinion because I know I'm not a troll. I say things as I see them.

The fact that I'm asked these questions is not a good thing, the fact that I was ganged up on is not a good thing. Then you wonder why this place isn't fun. My name is padib. For the record, I wonder how much opinion you've emitted on games you haven't plaeyed. I simply cannot afford all consoles and games, certainly not new releases very easily. It would be better if you judged me rather on the content of my posts. For instance, in the "Sony should make less games" thread, I don't see how I was being unreasonable, and many Sony fans seemed to agree with me (even one here who ganged up on me and hinted I was trolling).

I don't mind unrealistic physics. These, on the other hand, (unless my eyes fail me) seem either incomplete or overly simplistic. Thanks for listening.

i played the demo, it was fun, not sure if i will buy it though, maybe when its cheaper