Nsanity said:
Just so they can make your list bigger? |
Obviously.
The amount of sad MS badgering going on here is...sad
Nsanity said:
Just so they can make your list bigger? |
Obviously.
The amount of sad MS badgering going on here is...sad
deskpro2k3 said:
|
I disagree 100%. IMO there is no console this generation that offers so much variety like a Xbox 360 with Kinect.
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
Slimebeast said: Comparison of hardcore exclusives that are relevant for the future, meaning they are expected to get sequels |
You forgot Gran Turismo for Sony, The Last of Us (Wtf Last story? XD), Resistance (its bound to happen..), Motorstorm (They didnt save the team for nothing ;o). Just sayin'!
DirtyP2002 said:
|
Not sure if you're serious, or if I should feel sorry for you.
To me a censole is only for gaming, all this multimedia hub concept is bullshit to me.
pezus said:
I stopped reading when you said the Wii outsells the PS3 |
You stopped reading after you read the entire sentence?
Mr Puggsly said: The PS3 gets praise for getting so many exclusives, but it should be noted most of them aren't particularly great and have modest sales. Some of their IPs have even seen a sharp decline. Ultimately, the 360 has Halo, Gears, Forza, Fable, and Kinect. I personally think that outweighs Sony's line up which is why 360 is still going strong. |
I'm not a fan of shooters, racers, and motion controlled games so the PS3 will have more going for me than the Xbox 360. But in terms on catering to the masses in general, the titles you mention will outweigh the PS3's line up. In fact, Alan Wake and Fable appeal FAR more to me than the other titles you mentioned, but they are nowhere near as financially successful than the titles you mentioned. So sales in not the issue here.
deskpro2k3 said:
|
mods?
Anyway. The number of Xbox 360 games > Number of PS3 games > Number of Wii games.
99.9 % are multiplat anyway and Kinect offers something that can't be found on another platform at all. The mix between quality casual and quality core titles is the best in the industrie. Kinect sports, Dance Central, to Gears of War or Forza.
And don't get me started with XBLA >>>>>>>>> PSN.
But let me guess "Kinect does not count" met his older brother "XBLA does not count"
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
DirtyP2002 said:
|
Anything done on Kinect can be done with far greater accuracy on the Move (proven) and you dont need rails. The Kinect just more attractive to casuals who hate controls. The Move has titles both Kinect and Wii had exclusively. The best product and the best of both world whilst doing its own thing. Sony has far more high quality core titles with variety and in 2012 they've got their eyes set on multiplayer with Dust 415, Twisted Metal and Starhawk as well as single player exclusives. I got the PS3 in 2009 and still havent finished the quality backlog because the top games in the backlog because theres so many new games coming in. Microsoft cannot say this. I've already played Microsofts backlog.
Notice: I said the best product, not the most popular.
People always say XBLA games are far superior to PSN games as if PSN haz no gaemz...why is that?
Do these folks play both sets before coming to this conclusion or because MS bothers to advertise their XBLA games?