I'll post my review tomorrow after playing some PS move again or possibly tomorrow as I have already played enough Kinect and Wii motion plus to judge it.
1. Move- It has decent games, but no killer app until Sorcery comes out. It is supported in a lot of games, and it is super accurate.
2. WM+- Accurate, and it has the ultimate killer app. It just needs support.
3. Kinect- Not that much you can do with just a camera, and there isn't a killer app for the hardcore gamers. My opinion on it will change after Ryse.
Updated my review
| IamAwsome said: 1. Move- It has decent games, but no killer app until Sorcery comes out. It is supported in a lot of games, and it is super accurate. 2. WM+- Accurate, and it has the ultimate killer app. It just needs support. 3. Kinect- Not that much you can do with just a camera, and there isn't a killer app for the hardcore gamers. My opinion on it will change after Ryse. |
Everyone is crossing their fingers for Ryse to be the killer app.
I trust that Crytek would produce another wonderful game like what they did with Crysis 2
Yay!!!
| dsage01 said: It's been one year since Kinect and Move have been out (a bit over actually) and had a few big releases on each device. On the other hand Wii motion Plus has been out for over 2 years. I think it's fair to judge which one is better since it's been a while the three devices have been released. What is your opinion? Rank 1. PS Move/Kinect 9/10 Rank 3. Wii Motion Plus 7.5/10 Wii Motion Plus: I'll start off with the WM+ in simple wods its good but not great. The controls are fairly accurate and it has a decent selection of games due to the fact that it came a year and a half before both Kinect and Move. I don't own a Wii but I have played enough of it to judge it. To be honest with you I really hated the original Wii motion controller because the camera/sensor was really off and it took me plenty of time to learn how to properly use it. As mentioned earlier since I don't own a Wii I would play it at my cousin's house mostly and would stay overnight as he lives in a different country then I do. By the time I had to leave I had just got the hang of the Wii motion controlller (original) and I would play the Wii a little while later forgeting everything I learnt which got on my nerves pretty freqeuntly. Wii Motion Plus has improved upon the original Wii controller but the precision and accuracy still needs some improvement. PS Move/Kinect: To start off with both these devices are great and are worth a buy. Kinect has much more innovation but PS Move seems like a much more polished product more so when your comparing to the Wii controllers. Kinect dominates in Dance/ Party and Sports game while PS Move dominates in Shooters, action adventure games etc. Kinect does have some issues and lags but it never seems to irrate the hell out of me but it can get annoying once in a while. And MS just took its number one game type (shooters) and threw it into a garbage disrespectfully. I feel like an idiot when I'm playing shooting games on Kinect. I would like some sort of gun similar to the PS Move Sharpshooter which is great. Other than that Kinect is a great device. PS Move is also great almost perfect for shooting games and the precision, accuarcy is really great and the gameplay feels polished. Although for some reason the sensitivity is way too off for my liking. Either I turn way too fast or way too slow and while moving it does feel a bit too high. But both are great devices and I give it a tie.
|
i have a really hard time taking anything you say seriously due to your atrocious "xbox 360 and ps3 rule the world" comment in your signature. how, exactly, are we supposed to view you as a nonbiased, reliable source?
lewisgerm said:
|
lol argreed. But believe me I'm not too biased.
kinect is #1 for me. why game developers are slow to the table when hacktivist show you street fighter 4, bulletstorm, dead island, star wars force unleashed 2, and even skyrim FUS RO DAH! The sad part is they look better than most kinect games by majors.
Those hacks also proove that with a simple scheme you can make kinect optional games.
Like it or not kinect is a blast with kin. Kinect parties are hella fun that will leave your sides hurting from laughing. Also kinect is the new family member you get to talk to lol...
its not that kinect isnt capable of hardcore the questions are do you want to play them if a developer actually makes one. sega tried with rise of nightmare.
the reason i put kinect #1 is for the mere fact if microsoft add a controller its the perfect package. full body tracking with precision shooting with actual throwing, ducking, reloading etc... oh my. which points out another sony failure. it wouldve been better if they came out with a new eye with the release of move than later.
I was going to give the other 2 a toss up but then i thought about it. we are judging motion + on what its doing for wii. what will it do for the wii u should be the question. with the wii u cam you have move.
As my 4 move controllers sit in a draw waiting for EA to stop being p*SS**s and put out fight night for 2 with 4 actual controllers I realize that might never happen. The developers will always sell move short because most people only have one controller. Now grand slam tennis 2 is all move
| gameonbro said: kinect is #1 for me. why game developers are slow to the table when hacktivist show you street fighter 4, bulletstorm, dead island, star wars force unleashed 2, and even skyrim FUS RO DAH! The sad part is they look better than most kinect games by majors. Those hacks also proove that with a simple scheme you can make kinect optional games. Like it or not kinect is a blast with kin. Kinect parties are hella fun that will leave your sides hurting from laughing. Also kinect is the new family member you get to talk to lol... its not that kinect isnt capable of hardcore the questions are do you want to play them if a developer actually makes one. sega tried with rise of nightmare. the reason i put kinect #1 is for the mere fact if microsoft add a controller its the perfect package. full body tracking with precision shooting with actual throwing, ducking, reloading etc... oh my. which points out another sony failure. it wouldve been better if they came out with a new eye with the release of move than later. I was going to give the other 2 a toss up but then i thought about it. we are judging motion + on what its doing for wii. what will it do for the wii u should be the question. with the wii u cam you have move. As my 4 move controllers sit in a draw waiting for EA to stop being p*SS**s and put out fight night for 2 with 4 actual controllers I realize that might never happen. The developers will always sell move short because most people only have one controller. Now grand slam tennis 2 is all move |
So I understand your viewpoint and why Kinect is your number one. But I don't get your number 2 and number 3 at all. If you can elaborate more on those points it can be nice because for WM+ your saying "what can it do for the Wii U" while we have we're just judjing on the controller not the system. For PS Move you want Fight Night to work with 4 controllers.
well my problem with those reviews... is that people seem to forget 2 things... that the tech itself should not be considered in a gaming only referential... and also the cost compare to level of tech should be an important element....
now tell me how M+ and move with the tech it is vs kinect at 150 less is a better deal and a better device.... yeah move is more precise on games... but come on find me anybody who can offer a 3d tracking device with voice recognition and spatialization for under 150..... that in itself makes the kinect pretty god damn amazing compare to the competition IMO... and opens an all new door in the 3D tracking and voice recognition world behond the world of gaming.... imagine how many electronic device run windows in the world now take Kinect and apply a functionality for it on that device.... I think MS holds something a little more precious than move is for sony and M+ for nintendo....
| endimion said: well my problem with those reviews... is that people seem to forget 2 things... that the tech itself should not be considered in a gaming only referential... and also the cost compare to level of tech should be an important element.... now tell me how M+ and move with the tech it is vs kinect at 150 less is a better deal and a better device.... yeah move is more precise on games... but come on find me anybody who can offer a 3d tracking device with voice recognition and spatialization for under 150..... that in itself makes the kinect pretty god damn amazing compare to the competition IMO... and opens an all new door in the 3D tracking and voice recognition world behond the world of gaming.... imagine how many electronic device run windows in the world now take Kinect and apply a functionality for it on that device.... I think MS holds something a little more precious than move is for sony and M+ for nintendo.... |
i always laugh at that argument. especially considering a full move experience was more expensive. sure you can get away with just the eye and move but to play fight one move is totally lame so you buy 2. that was the price of kinect alone. do you go with holding a controller or get the navi i got the navi. so for a 2 player experience i went with the eye bundle 2 navis and 3 additional move. you do the math. 1 kinect is all you need.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
