gameonbro on 29 December 2011
| endimion said: well my problem with those reviews... is that people seem to forget 2 things... that the tech itself should not be considered in a gaming only referential... and also the cost compare to level of tech should be an important element.... now tell me how M+ and move with the tech it is vs kinect at 150 less is a better deal and a better device.... yeah move is more precise on games... but come on find me anybody who can offer a 3d tracking device with voice recognition and spatialization for under 150..... that in itself makes the kinect pretty god damn amazing compare to the competition IMO... and opens an all new door in the 3D tracking and voice recognition world behond the world of gaming.... imagine how many electronic device run windows in the world now take Kinect and apply a functionality for it on that device.... I think MS holds something a little more precious than move is for sony and M+ for nintendo.... |
i always laugh at that argument. especially considering a full move experience was more expensive. sure you can get away with just the eye and move but to play fight one move is totally lame so you buy 2. that was the price of kinect alone. do you go with holding a controller or get the navi i got the navi. so for a 2 player experience i went with the eye bundle 2 navis and 3 additional move. you do the math. 1 kinect is all you need.
