By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Tales of Xillia is rated 3/5 on Amazon.co.jp . Why?

For me, Amazon.co.jp has always been the most reliable source when it comes to rating jRPGs.  Famitsu is...  well...  Famitsu.  And Western reviewers tend to rate games lower for attributes specific to the genre sometimes (feminine looking male characters, not being enough like Elder Scrolls or Mass Effect, and other superficial crap).

 

I don't have a great handle on Japanese and still learning.  Does anyone else that has a better handle on the language able to tell me what the complaints are about the game?



"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."  --Hermann Goering, leading Nazi party member, at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials 

 

Conservatives:  Pushing for a small enough government to be a guest in your living room, or even better - your uterus.

 

Around the Network

I think its mainly the main story being short. You have to go through the game with the 2 different protagonist in order to get a reasonable lenght of play time. Which is basically playing the same game twice but with a different view. And even then, I heard that the lenght of the 2 playthrough is less then Vesperia :(.



Translate.Google.com



Too bad!

Truth to be told, my obsession has always been Graces and I wasn't really hyped about Xillia, I wouldn't allow my little heart to suffer so much again.



Well its not as meaty as say vesperia or abyss from what i have read. The main story is around 40-50 hours which is good. Though it lacks cameo battles boss challenges and a few other things that other tales games had on their release. Though the battle system is probably the best in the series. I haven't played much of it though just what ive hear. Funny people say its a bit short. Though thats only for a tales rpg as 40 hours is a good length for other rpg series. A friend let me borrow the japanese copy and i hate playing japanese games that arent in English so i didn't play it for longer than an hour. but i like it alot from that hour.



Around the Network

40-50 hours is with 2 playthrough, thats extremely short.



Icyedge said:

40-50 hours is with 2 playthrough, thats extremely short.


I dont think it is a friend of mine beat it in 45 hours 1 playthrough and he skipped a nice amount of cutscenes. 



FinalEvangelion said:

For me, Amazon.co.jp has always been the most reliable source when it comes to rating jRPGs.  Famitsu is...  well...  Famitsu.  And Western reviewers tend to rate games lower for attributes specific to the genre sometimes (feminine looking male characters, not being enough like Elder Scrolls or Mass Effect, and other superficial crap).

 

I don't have a great handle on Japanese and still learning.  Does anyone else that has a better handle on the language able to tell me what the complaints are about the game?

Wait, this can't be possibly be serious....

 

Public outlets were people just throw reviews on a game are never reliable. Look at DQ9. That game was at a 2/5 when it released. Do you honestly think it's a 4/10 game?



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Mad55 said:
Icyedge said:

40-50 hours is with 2 playthrough, thats extremely short.


I dont think it is a friend of mine beat it in 45 hours 1 playthrough and he skipped a nice amount of cutscenes. 

Really? Its nice then.



outlawauron said:
FinalEvangelion said:

For me, Amazon.co.jp has always been the most reliable source when it comes to rating jRPGs.  Famitsu is...  well...  Famitsu.  And Western reviewers tend to rate games lower for attributes specific to the genre sometimes (feminine looking male characters, not being enough like Elder Scrolls or Mass Effect, and other superficial crap).

 

I don't have a great handle on Japanese and still learning.  Does anyone else that has a better handle on the language able to tell me what the complaints are about the game?

Wait, this can't be possibly be serious....

 

Public outlets were people just throw reviews on a game are never reliable. Look at DQ9. That game was at a 2/5 when it released. Do you honestly think it's a 4/10 game?


I generally find them more accurate than other review sources although there are some exceptions.  I'm hoping this is one of them.



"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."  --Hermann Goering, leading Nazi party member, at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials 

 

Conservatives:  Pushing for a small enough government to be a guest in your living room, or even better - your uterus.