radishhead said: Before I nameclaim, I want to know if other people besides Stef support claims of names that may give a clue to a role. |
DAMN thanks for pointing that out... it should be RECONSIDER T.T
radishhead said: Before I nameclaim, I want to know if other people besides Stef support claims of names that may give a clue to a role. |
DAMN thanks for pointing that out... it should be RECONSIDER T.T
or even better... some expression thats negating the consideration of claiming...
like:
IF your name hints at your role please DO NOT consider doing so (I remember from KH that there was a mayor and a doctor inside Nightmare before Christmas
Damn... I should make no posts when I have drunk alkoholic beverages... BUT they are so tasty...
I'm pretty sure I already know everyone's roles, so...yaknow
I can only see this helping mafia.
Mafia can easily pick any of the 50 side character names and we'd be right back where we started, except mafia would then know all the power roles.
But if you want I can start.
theprof00 said: I'm pretty sure I already know everyone's roles, so...yaknow I can only see this helping mafia. Mafia can easily pick any of the 50 side character names and we'd be right back where we started, except mafia would then know all the power roles. But if you want I can start. |
You may - actually I am hoping for Mafia fakeclaiming the wrong character... finally ending up like me in the FMA game - though there are a lot of side chars left to claim
Interesting development is stefl's idea that the vigilante is in fact a SK who was blocked by the doc first night. That could also be an explanation to why the vigilante didn't come out yet, there is no vigilante. An SK in the equation would also give the game more balance, contrast to our initial belief of an all out vigilant. There's some weight to your argument stefl, and I pat you on the back for enlightening us on the matter. It's very possible.
I am the black sheep "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson
To further add to the theory of the SK, the OP does not mention types of kills except that it's a night kill. And last I checked, that could mean anything.
I am the black sheep "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson
hatmoza said: Interesting development is stefl's idea that the vigilante is in fact a SK who was blocked by the doc first night. That could also be an explanation to why the vigilante didn't come out yet, there is no vigilante. An SK in the equation would also give the game more balance, contrast to our initial belief of an all out vigilant. There's some weight to your argument stefl, and I pat you on the back for enlightening us on the matter. It's very possible. |
Did your sarcasm just say "IN YA FACE" or am I just misjudging your crazyness often stated by others?
hatmoza said: To further add to the theory of the SK, the OP does not mention types of kills except that it's a night kill. And last I checked, that could mean anything. |
NINJA!!!
hatmoza said: Interesting development is stefl's idea that the vigilante is in fact a SK who was blocked by the doc first night. That could also be an explanation to why the vigilante didn't come out yet, there is no vigilante. An SK in the equation would also give the game more balance, contrast to our initial belief of an all out vigilant. There's some weight to your argument stefl, and I pat you on the back for enlightening us on the matter. It's very possible. |
dot dot dot
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.