By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Twas the Night Before Christmas-Mafia Round 35

theprof00 said:
Wonk, why don't you start with saying why you think Linkz suspects you. I think that is a justifiable request.


I didn't respond to this before but I do have to say it is one of the scummiest posts I have ever read. Asking the accused to come up with reasons for their own accusation? Really prof?

Like you would have let anyone else get away with posting a vote and no reasons for as long as linkz did.



Around the Network

Wonktonodi said:

bla bla vanilla bla bla


great, an other vanilla claim... so to be fair to stefl, I'll ask for your name too =)



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Linkz come up with a lot of good points.

Vot



NoCtiS_NoX said:
Linkz come up with a lot of good points.

Vote Wonk


EBWOP 

Sorry my broswer is acting weird.



Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
Wonk, why don't you start with saying why you think Linkz suspects you. I think that is a justifiable request.


I didn't respond to this before but I do have to say it is one of the scummiest posts I have ever read. Asking the accused to come up with reasons for their own accusation? Really prof?

Like you would have let anyone else get away with posting a vote and no reasons for as long as linkz did.

I wanted to see if you had any idea.

If you were scum, don't you think mafia teammates would have said "wonk, that whole thing with X was bad"?

Plus you didn't make the excuse of a crazy cop or some other role. I thought your reaction was quite good considering.

 

Also, Linkz has earned a modicum of trust. If it were any other situation, yes. I agree.



Around the Network
Stefl1504 said:
Hephaestos said:


thank you

(i'll wait a bit to see if there's a counter before commenting. It'd be your luck to get 2 counter claims to your characters in 5 games :p)


I am 100% sure I will get no counterclaims.

Maybe that's because you've chosen one of the most obscure character from the movie. I'm not saying it's impossible that it's who you are (Gate Keeper and Mr. Hyde aren't exactly main characters either) but let's say your nameclaim does nothing to convince me you're town like if you'd have claimed "Sally" for example.



Signature goes here!

How convenient for you to claim town after it's been suggested by many that this game has plenty of 'em. Also having stalled us for so long, I thought you'd come up with a better defense Wonk.

Overall, weak. I'm happy lynching you today.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Hephaestos said:
theprof00 said:

You personally are not crucial. You are the most confirmed townie. We get another one, and we're in a very good place.

Yeah, your response had me make the decision that either my assumption was wrong or lots of other things were wrong. Lazily, I picked the easy way out and determined that my assumption was wrong.

After long consideration, Heph's answer isn't all that great either though "Oh yeah I knew that...except ________".

Actually, i'd though you'd like my answer...basically I said that I believe there are 2 close to confirmed townies, yet didn't say who was the second to not draw him attention.

1 confirmed gives the doc an option. He's a very bad kill choice.

2 confirmed starts to lock the doc on these players without much benefit to the town... though the doc might wander elswere still... protection is halved or more for both townies.

3 confirmed +, the town does have a significant advantage, worth the full time of the doc.

 

well that's my logic at least.

If that's what you meant, that's great.

That's exactly how I feel about the doc, but then....

....why didn't you say anything to Hat? "2" is exactly what Hat is doing by "clearing" you, hinting at himself to be a power, etc.
It's great that we think the same about the issue, but I'm conflicted because you don't have the same read as I do on Hat yet you allow him to continue.

It's also haunting when I read Hat's post saying "I expected a 'it's no different than your buddying with Heph'". I didn't see buddying. I saw a claim. So it makes me wonder whether there really is something going on between you two.



For the record, I don't agree with the Wonk lynch. I just get the feeling Linkz and Wonk are two townies screaming at each other. Linkz is the one I'm considering to be the most likely to be town between the two but that doesn't mean I can't be wrong.

I still don't trust Heph but I'll have to do some rereading (all the while cursing the lack of timestamps) to verify if my feelings are justified so I'll:

Unvote: Hephaestos

I'll be back later to vote on someone I really want to see lynched.



Signature goes here!

Stefl1504 said:


I do see that connection too but I think its not that relevant since he could very well tell the truth (about having the ability to combine 1 and 1 and find out that hat is cyclops), and by my opinion this is a little to vague to really justify something so far...

@ prof - the only think I did so far was to role hint... why shouldn't we hint at roles, when someone fakeclaims it may very well end up in a mess if he is claims wrong - finally even a fake hint may backfire and get someone lynched. So I have nothing against hatmoza only hinting at his role... (well he revealed it by now)

Stefl, I'm curious as to how you could go after ST by saying this, when earlier, you said the above about Hat. I could remind you that at that point in time, Hat was not hinting at being vanilla. Which you seem to affirm here. The latter being after Hat claimed vanilla.

You also confirmed Hat here, not even halfway into the day, from what I'm guessing was completely based on a nameclaim.