By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Twas the Night Before Christmas-Mafia Round 35

Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Well, I thought this was goign to end up with some good leads.

Linkz is the only one who should have been doc'd.

My thought process was that the inherent safeness of the MG kill was motivated by an unclear view of who might be doc'd. Looking back at yesterday, hardly anyone stood out as a good choice.

My idea was that the people who didn't understand that Linkz should have been doc'd were most likely mafia.
But it seems nobody in this thread (except for maybe Heph) had any idea....

So you thought I was mafia for not realizing I should have been doc'd? Heh, I know I threw it out there as a consideration if ST flipped scum, but I don't actually think I'm that crucial for town to win.

I do believe Heph when he says he knew it, since he was first to suggest it really.

You personally are not crucial. You are the most confirmed townie. We get another one, and we're in a very good place.

Yeah, your response had me make the decision that either my assumption was wrong or lots of other things were wrong. Lazily, I picked the easy way out and determined that my assumption was wrong.

After long consideration, Heph's answer isn't all that great either though "Oh yeah I knew that...except ________".



Around the Network

The only way I'll trust Linkz is town is if we proceed with Wonk's lynch and Wonk flips scum. And if that happens, I'll likely get on prof's ass til he's lynched tomorrow.

Last time I said I'd get on prof's ass in a mafia game, he killed me the same night ...



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

theprof00 said:
hatmoza said:
theprof00 said:
Well, I thought this was goign to end up with some good leads.

Linkz is the only one who should have been doc'd.

My thought process was that the inherent safeness of the MG kill was motivated by an unclear view of who might be doc'd. Looking back at yesterday, hardly anyone stood out as a good choice.

My idea was that the people who didn't understand that Linkz should have been doc'd were most likely mafia.
But it seems nobody in this thread (except for maybe Heph) had any idea....

I hate this. Stop indirectly telling the doc what to do. It's just scummy. I never like when players tell other power players who to specifically or pseudo-protect/investigate.

If anything, you're back on my scum watch. Don't under estimate what people see or don't see. Don't make it seem like there was a plan to any of this. I see this as nothing short of fishing. So, there.

Also, the buddying with Linkz makes me want to PUKE!

ho hum.

I know I'm right, and I will read it in the scum thread eventually.

 

FYI, you're doing a great job with the doc yourself. I'm keeping a personal log of all the things I've noted (like you did in that one game), and your not doing so hot in it :D

 


sigh. Read what? I have absolutely no idea what the bolded part of what I said links to your response. double sigh -I was waiting for something along the lines of, "it's not any different than your buddying up to heph ...

and please at the fyi, if that's an attempt to get me worked up. How insulting as Linkz put it. I invented mafia abuse. Just look how fucked up I made Wonk with a few posts. :D

 

I don't trust you anymore ... I'ma keep my EYE on you too.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Linkzmax said:

Enough of the talk about MG dying.

Why only an FoS for Wonk today when you voted him yesterday?(before ultimately unvoting)

Also any other suspects, and who do you think is town?

Well, I wanted even more evidence, and now with Truck's post, I'm about to vote for Wonk, but I'll wait a bit.

I currently don't have any other major suspects, I need to dig a little deeper.

And about town, Heph and Hatmoza seem like the cleanest ones for me.



Hephaestos said:

 Here's the history:

Stefl1504 said:
Linkzmax said:
You've admitted to being bored when vanilla, yet your first post said "I like my role - its so nice to be something else sometimes^^"


Humm^^ can't say I remember playing the last few times... so it just may be that I don't remember being anything else than mafia, lurker, loser... from when is that statement (me getting bored when vanilla)?

Stefl1504 said:
Linkzmax said:
It's from many rounds ago, and could have even been in a quicktopic thread. I remember it vividly though, because I used it to peg you as a power role the time you were Lie Detector. You were very active and not obvscum.

You have been mafia quite a bit from recent recollection though,(I need to update the archives, like majorly) so I could see that as an exciting change of pace.


DON'T EVER TALK ABOUT THE LIE DETECTOR THING AGAIN!!! *cough* i messes up *cough*

and yeah I remember that I said it^^ I just don't remember when I said it...

Final-Fan said:
Oh -- the last 4 posts make Linkz's discovery less dramatic evidence than it looked like at first. Still!

How the hell does this stay at that?

Stefl, you claim vanilla (one would assume you get a penalty for that and thus would not have been so forward in claiming such so openly), surely you won't mind Name claiming (autorized in rule 1) ) to solidfy this claim...

Undersea Gal



Around the Network
Final-Fan said:
I guess I got sidetracked by the other talk. Now that I'm reminded, I also remember he's the one that promised an analysis of ST when he thought prof was going to vote him, and when that didn't happen never followed up (your "following the leader" video). And I don't recall that behavior ever being explained.

Stefl, can you give a better explanation of that than that you were going to cover for your scumbuddy, but then decided it wasn't necessary?

Vote stefl.


Sorry... if I understand you wrong... so you are basically saying that I was saying once that I am going to make a analysis of ST?

And no... I never did think prof was going to vote for him, I thought he already voted for ST:

Stefl1504 said:
Argh.... damnit... I think I mixed some of Linkz posts with Profs posts T.T - i somehow thought prof was voting for ST...

but even so, I voted for Silver Tiger a bit later (after ST fakeclaimed Daytime Roleblocker), for reasons see older posts...

But I never promised a Analysis of ST and if I did so I please would like you to quote me where I did, in case I understood your initial question/accusation(because I am pretty sure I did not, since I am quite puzzled with: Stefl, can you give a better explanation of that than that you were going to cover for your scumbuddy, but then decided it wasn't necessary?).

Also please quote me where you think I am covering for a scumbuddy.



morenoingrato said:
Linkzmax said:

Enough of the talk about MG dying.

Why only an FoS for Wonk today when you voted him yesterday?(before ultimately unvoting)

Also any other suspects, and who do you think is town?

Well, I wanted even more evidence, and now with Truck's post, I'm about to vote for Wonk, but I'll wait a bit.

I currently don't have any other major suspects, I need to dig a little deeper.

And about town, Heph and Hatmoza seem like the cleanest ones for me.

What is it you're waiting for?

Yes you should dig more. It's good to have a top suspect, but I want to know who else you are suspicious of.

So you have no change in town reads on anyone else since 5 days ago? What makes them clean to you?



Stefl1504 said:

Undersea Gal


thank you

(i'll wait a bit to see if there's a counter before commenting. It'd be your luck to get 2 counter claims to your characters in 5 games :p)



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Hephaestos said:
Stefl1504 said:

Undersea Gal


thank you

(i'll wait a bit to see if there's a counter before commenting. It'd be your luck to get 2 counter claims to your characters in 5 games :p)


I am 100% sure I will get no counterclaims.



Well actually I was trying to say with my earlier post... feel free to comment on my claim... since I will try to disprove any counterclaims faster than the claimee can try to get himself out of his mess...