By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Twas the Night Before Christmas-Mafia Round 35

Wonktonodi said:
Reading 100 post and finding something useful in there is better than having nothing to read since no one is posting.

unless you mean the doc protecting the doc himself I am very curious to who you think is the only person with protecting

really? you have no idea who needed protection after yesterday?



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network
theprof00 said:
Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
Simply that we are going to get much by looking at it, and could be littered with wifom.
The way this game is going, disarray seems to be the commonality.

This game isn't that bad, I don't feel we're as scattered as you make it seem.

While I think we could benefit from the focused approach you've proposed, the truth of it is that we're now stuck in limbo waiting for Linkzmax to tell us why he's so suspicious of Wonk.

Please.

I accept total responsibility from the thread being currently devoid of foaming at the mouth. You want to propose something, then do it. But better there are less rabid posts to read, than a false picture of genuine activty.

the thread is currently devoid of anything

good job

would you rather people talk when there is something worth talking about, or reading through 100 posts of nonsense?

Here's something to talk about. With the way the conversation was going, there was only a couple significant points. Linkz' vote, and the votes following his. Linkz said it's laziness to not see the problem with wonk.

I myself don't see anything beyond his weirdness during the ST lynch. But it didn't look to me that he was trying to distract anyone. If anyone was being distracting, it was Heph on Stefl and his reluctance at Linkz' reasoning, which was actually very sound.

I'm kinda typing in a rush, so I know I'm missing something.

Why don't you read through the day and come up with your own points? It's not my job to provide you with something to talk about. It only makes me think that I'm inconveniencing your plans at active lurking.

Where is all this nonsense you speak of. The game started slow, but day one picked up quite nicely I'd say. Day two has been off to a pretty good start as well, though I'm still waiting for a few people to speak up.

I said I haven't been lazy like hat, not that it's laziness not to see why Wonk deserves a vote.

If anyone seemed like they didn't want ST to be lynched it was actually hat, so it's not soley based on the activity after ST came under fire. Though if you can honestly say thisthisthis, and this(though given I liked Stefl being an alternative I don't hold the questioning against Wonk) aren't distracting then how can you call today disorganized? For reference, I still think this conversation was a subtle attempt at trying to throw suspicion my way, thereby making me a followup lynch candidate or even derailing the whole lynch on ST. And in fairness, these posts are in support of ST's lynch. 

I actually much rather preferred Heph's behavior during the lynch. Even if scum is lynched I don't like single candidate lynches. Heph's vote was focused and provided a second possible lynchee, but never actively fought against the ST lynch. He got Noctis to follow the vote, which could point to him being scum trying to save his buddy; however, I have trouble believing that is the case if ST was throwing him under the bus.



Oh and prof I too have no idea who you think was the only one deserving of doc protection. I'm curious who you mean, but seeing as I can neither protect nor kill it really doesn't matter if you share.



Son1x said:
Got the pm.

*poke

 

 

was he the civilian?



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

listen to you scrodem reachers ... is this how to ask trivial questions for dummies edition? It's obvious the person who needed the doc's protection most yesterday was MG. He was town after all, right? Or are we forgetting that?

If anything we should be criticizing the dumbass doc for not doing his frikkin job right. Hey doc, your job is for us to wake to no deaths the following day. It's not about protecting who's important like these dipshits are suggesting, it's about putting your head in the brain of the scum each passing night, and preventing them from being successful.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Around the Network

And look at this pitiful discussion, we said we were going to slow down, now lick each others' wounds.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
Simply that we are going to get much by looking at it, and could be littered with wifom.
The way this game is going, disarray seems to be the commonality.

This game isn't that bad, I don't feel we're as scattered as you make it seem.

While I think we could benefit from the focused approach you've proposed, the truth of it is that we're now stuck in limbo waiting for Linkzmax to tell us why he's so suspicious of Wonk.

Please.

I accept total responsibility from the thread being currently devoid of foaming at the mouth. You want to propose something, then do it. But better there are less rabid posts to read, than a false picture of genuine activty.

the thread is currently devoid of anything

good job


Good job my dick, the reason the game was stopped was for you to explain to us why  we shouldn't lynch you, or why Linkz has you pegged as scum. You don't get to appear with a magical four word sentence and disappear. Get to convincing us that Linkz is wrong about you, because right now, I don't feel like taking my vote off you anymore.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
Simply that we are going to get much by looking at it, and could be littered with wifom.
The way this game is going, disarray seems to be the commonality.

This game isn't that bad, I don't feel we're as scattered as you make it seem.

While I think we could benefit from the focused approach you've proposed, the truth of it is that we're now stuck in limbo waiting for Linkzmax to tell us why he's so suspicious of Wonk.

Please.

I accept total responsibility from the thread being currently devoid of foaming at the mouth. You want to propose something, then do it. But better there are less rabid posts to read, than a false picture of genuine activty.

the thread is currently devoid of anything

good job

would you rather people talk when there is something worth talking about, or reading through 100 posts of nonsense?

Here's something to talk about. With the way the conversation was going, there was only a couple significant points. Linkz' vote, and the votes following his. Linkz said it's laziness to not see the problem with wonk.

I myself don't see anything beyond his weirdness during the ST lynch. But it didn't look to me that he was trying to distract anyone. If anyone was being distracting, it was Heph on Stefl and his reluctance at Linkz' reasoning, which was actually very sound.

I'm kinda typing in a rush, so I know I'm missing something.

Why don't you read through the day and come up with your own points? It's not my job to provide you with something to talk about. It only makes me think that I'm inconveniencing your plans at active lurking.

Where is all this nonsense you speak of. The game started slow, but day one picked up quite nicely I'd say. Day two has been off to a pretty good start as well, though I'm still waiting for a few people to speak up.

I said I haven't been lazy like hat, not that it's laziness not to see why Wonk deserves a vote.

If anyone seemed like they didn't want ST to be lynched it was actually hat, so it's not soley based on the activity after ST came under fire. Though if you can honestly say thisthisthis, and this(though given I liked Stefl being an alternative I don't hold the questioning against Wonk) aren't distracting then how can you call today disorganized? For reference, I still think this conversation was a subtle attempt at trying to throw suspicion my way, thereby making me a followup lynch candidate or even derailing the whole lynch on ST. And in fairness, these posts are in support of ST's lynch. 

I actually much rather preferred Heph's behavior during the lynch. Even if scum is lynched I don't like single candidate lynches. Heph's vote was focused and provided a second possible lynchee, but never actively fought against the ST lynch. He got Noctis to follow the vote, which could point to him being scum trying to save his buddy; however, I have trouble believing that is the case if ST was throwing him under the bus.

The King is flattered you feel the need to constantly call him lazy. If there's one thing I learned from you in the dead thread and recent games is that you can't stand how successful I am in these games. X-D And when people be hating, you know you're doing something right.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

well the thing of not in that wasn't the reference to Mr "I'm the king", more the background analysis on Wonk or (what I find personnally the most clever part of the post) the ST Noctis relationship.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

wow... and I even have Firefox underlining spelling mistakes for me...

"well the thing of notE in that wasn't the reference to Mr "I'm the king", more the background analysis on Wonk or (what I find persoNally the most clever part of the post) the ST Noctis relationship."



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO