By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Twas the Night Before Christmas-Mafia Round 35

Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
Flavor hints at no SK.
Whether Mr. Hyde was actually the one to receive the present really wasn't relevent. It would still be sucessful in killing an innocent member of Halloween Town.

possibly says something else, but I'm really not sure what.

Also, the flavor says that anonymous put a package in the middle of town, and the small child delivered it. Some kind of middleman thing? Something fun to think about, but at this point, seemingly useless.

Mg? Odd. Mafia could've had their pick of anyone in the town. I'm positive that there was only one person worthy of being doc'd. Perhaps his silence hinted at power role? I'll have to reread as MG surely didn't stand out as anything special.


who do you consider the only person worthy of being doc'd?

Probably himself... ;P

Honestly though, if i where the doc I would've protected myself, but maybe day 1 would've turned out otherwise if I where to be the doc...
but I would also like to know who would consider worth docing



Around the Network
Stefl1504 said:
Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
Flavor hints at no SK.
Whether Mr. Hyde was actually the one to receive the present really wasn't relevent. It would still be sucessful in killing an innocent member of Halloween Town.

possibly says something else, but I'm really not sure what.

Also, the flavor says that anonymous put a package in the middle of town, and the small child delivered it. Some kind of middleman thing? Something fun to think about, but at this point, seemingly useless.

Mg? Odd. Mafia could've had their pick of anyone in the town. I'm positive that there was only one person worthy of being doc'd. Perhaps his silence hinted at power role? I'll have to reread as MG surely didn't stand out as anything special.


who do you consider the only person worthy of being doc'd?

Probably himself... ;P

Honestly though, if i where the doc I would've protected myself, but maybe day 1 would've turned out otherwise if I where to be the doc...
but I would also like to know who would consider worth docing

Oh, if only you had known!

You could've killed anyone in the town. Not played safe like you did.

But thank you for pushing the issue. I didn't think of it that way. To me it's obvious who should have been doc'd, so a safe kill is a bit off. Perhaps it wasn't necessitated by safety? That's a good question..

Of course it could simply be a "planted and wiped" piece of evidence; there may be no real reason other than to distract. I'll leave this alone and keep my investigation to myself unless someone is really interested.



I would at least like to know what you mean by "planted and wiped"...



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Simply that we are going to get much by looking at it, and could be littered with wifom.
The way this game is going, disarray seems to be the commonality.



theprof00 said:
Simply that we are going to get much by looking at it, and could be littered with wifom.
The way this game is going, disarray seems to be the commonality.

This game isn't that bad, I don't feel we're as scattered as you make it seem.

While I think we could benefit from the focused approach you've proposed, the truth of it is that we're now stuck in limbo waiting for Linkzmax to tell us why he's so suspicious of Wonk.



Signature goes here!

Around the Network
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
Simply that we are going to get much by looking at it, and could be littered with wifom.
The way this game is going, disarray seems to be the commonality.

This game isn't that bad, I don't feel we're as scattered as you make it seem.

While I think we could benefit from the focused approach you've proposed, the truth of it is that we're now stuck in limbo waiting for Linkzmax to tell us why he's so suspicious of Wonk.

Please.

I accept total responsibility from the thread being currently devoid of foaming at the mouth. You want to propose something, then do it. But better there are less rabid posts to read, than a false picture of genuine activty.



theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
Simply that we are going to get much by looking at it, and could be littered with wifom.
The way this game is going, disarray seems to be the commonality.

This game isn't that bad, I don't feel we're as scattered as you make it seem.

While I think we could benefit from the focused approach you've proposed, the truth of it is that we're now stuck in limbo waiting for Linkzmax to tell us why he's so suspicious of Wonk.

Please.

I accept total responsibility from the thread being currently devoid of foaming at the mouth. You want to propose something, then do it. But better there are less rabid posts to read, than a false picture of genuine activty.

the thread is currently devoid of anything

good job



Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
Simply that we are going to get much by looking at it, and could be littered with wifom.
The way this game is going, disarray seems to be the commonality.

This game isn't that bad, I don't feel we're as scattered as you make it seem.

While I think we could benefit from the focused approach you've proposed, the truth of it is that we're now stuck in limbo waiting for Linkzmax to tell us why he's so suspicious of Wonk.

Please.

I accept total responsibility from the thread being currently devoid of foaming at the mouth. You want to propose something, then do it. But better there are less rabid posts to read, than a false picture of genuine activty.

the thread is currently devoid of anything

good job

would you rather people talk when there is something worth talking about, or reading through 100 posts of nonsense?

Here's something to talk about. With the way the conversation was going, there was only a couple significant points. Linkz' vote, and the votes following his. Linkz said it's laziness to not see the problem with wonk.

I myself don't see anything beyond his weirdness during the ST lynch. But it didn't look to me that he was trying to distract anyone. If anyone was being distracting, it was Heph on Stefl and his reluctance at Linkz' reasoning, which was actually very sound.

I'm kinda typing in a rush, so I know I'm missing something.

Why don't you read through the day and come up with your own points? It's not my job to provide you with something to talk about. It only makes me think that I'm inconveniencing your plans at active lurking.



Wonk, why don't you start with saying why you think Linkz suspects you. I think that is a justifiable request.



Reading 100 post and finding something useful in there is better than having nothing to read since no one is posting.

unless you mean the doc protecting the doc himself I am very curious to who you think is the only person with protecting