Please trucks, answer prof's questions. I'm honestly quite interested in your answer.

I wasn't looking for something out of the ordinary from MDJ something as simple as "I was just goofing around on my first post" would have sufficed. He could also have gotten a valuable town role and if he felt he wasn't skilled enough to use it wisely, his statement would have made sense since he would have felt the pressure because he didn't want to let the town down.

On the flip side, if he had responded by bending the truth radish-style to make himself look good (something like "I wanted to generate discussion") then my suspicions of him would have risen considerably.

I really wish you played better as scum but sadly no. You are playing just as you did last time only more poorly.  This post is so sloppy and fully of logic fails, contradictions, and lies it's really quite pathetic.

I will break them all down if people ask me to but for now I will see if I can find your scum buddies.

I would actually prefer explanations, yes. Because right now ... you're being crazy, but maybe I'm just having a hard time making any sense of what you are saying.

Please, "break it down" for me. And give me your thoughts on prof while you're at it.

But you said that your options might have generated a "yes that's what I meant" response from MJ. I don't see anything listed just now that could've fit that scenario.

I guess I just don't understand the pressuring aspect. You had a vote, so what would he have had to say to remove it. You say that "if he said X, you suspicion would have risen", but your vote was already on him.

I can understand someone like Wonk saying that the reasoning was to get him to start playing, but your pressure was just for a reply, and "just goofing off" might have sufficed? If I put myself in your shoes, I just can't think of a situation where I would put a vote just to get a simple answer and then remove it. Don't get me wrong, it FEELS like it's a bit of pressuring, but it's not well executed or reasoned, which makes me then feel like it's a hollow imitation at scum hunting.

But maybe you're just busy or not fully invested for some reason. I wouldn't say you're at the top of my list.

I point out that multiple people are useing poor reasoning and so I suspect them, to see if it was a misunderstanding or if there is something more sinister, because of this I have already found hat to be scum. You are looking more and more like scum yourself since calling someone defensive for pointing out 4 people making an error is a very weak argument. I will be moving on from you as well and see how ToS and vette play out. I doubt all 4 of you are a team but I am pretty sure it is more than just hat.

These responses sure are taking a long time.

ToS why did you vote when you did and not before?

at lease you got one maybe we should put two votes on ToS and see what the pressure does.

Unvote: Hat

Vote: ToS

I'm not so sure that Trucks is one to fall to pressure. I also don't think I WANT to pressure him. Let's just say that he tends to get "testy"