well, 19 perfect scores aint too shabby.

Its fucking 20 perfect scores! WHY arent they adding Playstation offical magazine austrailia? This is an outrage!!

Batman on the 360 has 22 perfect scores (PS3 version has 18)
UC3 has 19.. should be 20 anytime >_>
Portal 2 on the 360 has 19 (PS3 version has 14)

^I took the versions that had the most reviews.

I wanna know why they havent added OPM Austrailia..

EDIT:
On their site they have the following listed on their "What sites/magazines do we take into account"

Playstation: Official Magazine US
Playstation: Official Magazine UK
Playstation Official Magazine AU

On the UC3 meta, only UK is added. On the UC2 meta, UK US AND AU are added! All gave 10/10 to UC2!

either

1. they haven't gotten their copy yet and can't add it or

2. they be trolling

take your pick

Austrailia gave it a 10/10, UC3 I mean.

IS there any way to enlighten Metacritic about this? I can't find any way to contact them!

some of the lower scores baffle me. While I agree Uncharted is a touch overrated (my own personal score is 87), anything below an 8.0 is trolling. Sure, you may not like it, but objectively it does so many things so well that you really shouldn't be giving it a low score unless you're the kind of douche that goes "Well I don't like this, so I'mma give it a horrible score to troll meta".

I hate Halo, but I wouldn't give it a bad score.
I hate Grand Theft auto IV, but I wouldn't give it a horrible score

Objectivity, people.

Great locales
great graphics
Outstanding sound
top-notch writing
Unrivaled voice acting
truly wonderful action set pieces
Nice blend of gunplay, platforming, and adventure/puzzle solving

on the flipside:

Some visual glitches
aiming issues
too linear for some.

but I say that, while linear is bad to a lot of people, it was a sacrifice Naughty Dog had to make, because there's no way they'd be able to make the experience as exciting as it was if you were granted full freedom. I'm okay with linearity as long as there's a reason for it. this is a perfect example of that. The visual glitches are unpleasant but not game breaking, and the Aiming issues are gonna be fixed.

Giving a game a 4/10 because it's linear, or a 5/10 because it's mechanics are 'archaic' is bullshit. especially when those same publications gave games like Modern Warfare a rave review in spite of an utter lack of innovation there. I don't know why they felt so inclined to give a shitty score, but they can both blow me.

iam surprise AV club gave Uncharted 3 a C, consider it lucky. giving UC3 a C is a little too much it deserve a an F or a D.
piss of poor game, over hyped failed to its very core and disappointment through an through.
Game of the year pfft dream on Skyrim will bury it to the ground.

Ohhhh noooooooooooo.

Strategy Informer 75 added to Meta.

6200 / 67 = 92.54 (rounded to 93).

19 perfect scores.

92 is just getting more and more probable...

WHY arent they adding OPM AU?! I thought it had good weight too!!

Added GameShark to Meta... 75.

6275 / 68 = 92.28 (rounded to 92).

19 perfect scores.

Metacritic really sucks. As what they're doing to UC3 by cherry picking particular scores to fix its average according to how much they've been bribed by rivals, they also trolled God of War III by not including many perfect scores (e.g. Guardian, Machinima, G4TV and many more) and the funny thing is, they started using publications from most of those sites literally a month or so after they stopped adding any more reviews... What an uncanny coincidence, they seem to give the top PS3 exclusives the short end of the stick.

And to add even more insult to injury they rounded down GOW3's average which was 92.71 (93%) based on the 101 reviews to 92% because of their fabricated 'weighting' system bullshit excuse. It's interesting how for example, they had no problem bumping MW2 360 up from an average of 93.19 (93%) to a 94%... 

Anyway who cares what UC3's Metascore is or about Metacritic in general, if you want a proper average go to your preferred game review sites and average it out yourself, that way you cut out all the amateur sites and get a more accurate average.