By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - GT5 vs F4 graphics (from in cockpit)/sound youtube comparison video--updated with DF comparison.

 

What is better for each game?

Sound: Forza 4 29 6.26%
 
Sound: GT5 6 1.30%
 
Graphics: Forza 4 14 3.02%
 
Graphics: GT5 67 14.47%
 
Sound/Graphics: Forza 4 109 23.54%
 
Sound/Graphics: GT5 144 31.10%
 
Sound: Both about the same 1 0.22%
 
Graphics: Both about the same 6 1.30%
 
Sound/Graphics: Both about the same 16 3.46%
 
See results. 69 14.90%
 
Total:461
Michael-5 on 04 November 2011
pezus said:
ME2 shouldn't be anywhere near the top imo, even the PC version doesn't look amazing. Great character models but everything else looks sterile, with no detail

Mass Effect 2 on PC is native 1080p. You know 1920x1080. You don't know what your talking about, it's one of the best looking PC games out there, and it has a ton of detail.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Around the Network
Michael-5 on 04 November 2011
ethomaz said:

Nsanity said:

There is already multiplatfom games that surpass exclusives on each system, but then again you and others in this thread dont really know the difference between pre-rendered, scripted, fixed camera or game that heavily depends on corridor like environments for its looks.

I don't want to argue with you (in fact I ignore most of your comments) but We've had several discussions here on the forum and all came to the conclusion about graphics:

UC2 = GoW3 > K3 > K2 > Gears 3 > ME2 > Crysis 2 > U1 > Gears 2 > Everything else.

The racing games are in another category for graphics comparison.

Stop pushing your opinion as that of everyones. Multiple people on this thread have already said they think KZ3 looks better then any other game out there. And Killzone 2 above Gears 3? Your joking? That game lacks polish and environment, it's just gray, gray, gray, and then ridiculous load times between levels.

Uncharted 1 also had really bland textures and pixilated environments.. It shouldn't even make the top games.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Michael-5 on 04 November 2011
o_O.Q said:
Michael-5 said:

One thing I like about Gears 3 is that everything is interactable, but you can't take cover on all objects in UC2, and some effects in Gears 3 (like Water) I think are best done in that game.

yeah michael being able to crouch behind a few objects in gears is really comparable to being able to hop over objects, climb objects, slide, swing, shimmy etc 

My arguement isn't which is a better game. I only said in Gears everyting is interactable, there are no transparent objects you can walk through, and no random blocks which don't go with the engine. Uncharted is a platformer, of course it does more. It can be really glitchy at times, but that's besides the point.

geez way to make a point into an insult.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Nsanity on 04 November 2011
ethomaz said:

Nsanity said:

There is already multiplatfom games that surpass exclusives on each system, but then again you and others in this thread dont really know the difference between pre-rendered, scripted, fixed camera or game that heavily depends on corridor like environments for its looks.

I don't want to argue with you (in fact I ignore most of your comments) but We've had several discussions here on the forum and all came to the conclusion about graphics:

UC2 = GoW3 > K3 > K2 > Gears 3 > ME2 > Crysis 2 > U1 > Gears 2 > Everything else.

The racing games are in another category for graphics comparison.

I dont want to either, but someones got to knock some sense into you.



o_O.Q on 04 November 2011
Michael-5 said:
o_O.Q said:
Michael-5 said:
 

One thing I like about Gears 3 is that everything is interactable, but you can't take cover on all objects in UC2, and some effects in Gears 3 (like Water) I think are best done in that game.

yeah michael being able to crouch behind a few objects in gears is really comparable to being able to hop over objects, climb objects, slide, swing, shimmy etc 

My arguement isn't which is a better game. I only said in Gears everyting is interactable, there are no transparent objects you can walk through, and no random blocks which don't go with the engine. Uncharted is a platformer, of course it does more. It can be really glitchy at times, but that's besides the point.

geez way to make a point into an insult.

"My arguement isn't which is a better game"

neither was mine but obviously when you make a comparison between gears and uncharted about interaction and imply gears has a higher level of interaction i'm going to call bullshit

"there are no transparent objects you can walk through"

lol what does this even mean?

"geez way to make a point into an insult."

i don't know how anything i said there could be interpretted as insult 



Around the Network
o_O.Q on 04 November 2011
Michael-5 said:
ethomaz said:

Nsanity said:

 There is already multiplatfom games that surpass exclusives on each system, but then again you and others in this thread dont really know the difference between pre-rendered, scripted, fixed camera or game that heavily depends on corridor like environments for its looks.

I don't want to argue with you (in fact I ignore most of your comments) but We've had several discussions here on the forum and all came to the conclusion about graphics:

UC2 = GoW3 > K3 > K2 > Gears 3 > ME2 > Crysis 2 > U1 > Gears 2 > Everything else.

The racing games are in another category for graphics comparison.

You say this ------->

Stop pushing your opinion as that of everyones.

 

then do this ------->

And Killzone 2 above Gears 3? Your joking? That game lacks polish and environment, it's just gray, gray, gray 

Uncharted 1 also had really bland textures and pixilated environments.. It shouldn't even make the top games.

 





yo_john117 on 04 November 2011
RolStoppable said:
yo_john117 said:
pezus said:
ME2 shouldn't be anywhere near the top imo, even the PC version doesn't look amazing. Great character models but everything else looks sterile, with no detail

No way, ME2 looks as good as Gears 3 does which is in the top 10 for console exclusives IMO.

What is this here? Kindergarden?

Has it come so far that we now put "imo" at the end of every statement? Stop acting like babies, that goes for both of you.

IMO you are wrong.



jneul on 04 November 2011

those games aren't even comparable!!
1. they run in different resolutions
2. forza 4 sacrificed the amount of cars on track compared to gt5, thus looking prettier, im pretty sure if gt5 had limited cars on track it hell would look prettier too, imo forza 4 went for style over substance....
3. they have different levels of realism - with gt being closer to real life on things like handling etc



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1

Michael-5 on 04 November 2011
o_O.Q said:
Michael-5 said:
ethomaz said:

Nsanity said:

 There is already multiplatfom games that surpass exclusives on each system, but then again you and others in this thread dont really know the difference between pre-rendered, scripted, fixed camera or game that heavily depends on corridor like environments for its looks.

I don't want to argue with you (in fact I ignore most of your comments) but We've had several discussions here on the forum and all came to the conclusion about graphics:

UC2 = GoW3 > K3 > K2 > Gears 3 > ME2 > Crysis 2 > U1 > Gears 2 > Everything else.

The racing games are in another category for graphics comparison.

You say this ------->

Stop pushing your opinion as that of everyones.

 

then do this ------->

And Killzone 2 above Gears 3? Your joking? That game lacks polish and environment, it's just gray, gray, gray 

Uncharted 1 also had really bland textures and pixilated environments.. It shouldn't even make the top games.



But the second half is opinion. I am questioning ethomazes logic, not telling him "Your wrong." I'm saying "What the heck, are you serious?"

There is a difference, maybe I should do as RollStoppable says.

Also for your other comment, I meant Insult towards a game. I didn't insult Uncharted, but you made what I say seem like an insult to the franchise.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

chocoloco on 04 November 2011

So after a million opinions and posts has anything been settled?