By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - PS3 Has “Tight memory, Poor IO Performance” – John Carmack

NotStan on 16 October 2011
x_DMX_x said:
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
Yup im totally going to believe this guy.This coming from the guy who claimed that "the PS3 verison of the game was easy to develop because of blu-ray platform it will be one of the dominant versions"Now he does this.Not only that but Microsoft pays developers to have muliplat games look better on 360.So this is the biggest bullshit ive heard since Wii HD.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHhahhahahahaha

Ok you laugh but, can you answer this question?

Why does Killzone 3 look better than any Xbox360 game and why cant any Multiplat game look as good as Killzone 3.

Ive seen comparisons on youtube with Killzone vs Crysis and Killzone looks better.

So can you answer my question?

You obviously have no frigging clue and just slinging mud around, I am actually genuinely surprised you haven't been banned yet, 90 posts, that's probably the longest one of you have lasted with such an attitude.

"Games look better on multiplatform, so Microsoft bribe all developers! It's a conspiracy man!"

Get your tinfoil hat on, I think microsoft might be using their satellites to look into your brain and steal ideas for 1st party games.

Rofl...and whos to say M$ doesnt pay off developers?You dont know that.You dont work for them.

i dont know that either but, ive seen alot of legit articles saying they do.

Well maybe the fact that if they continued to engage in such distatestful tactics it would have emerged so by now? It's been like what, a good 500 if not even considerably more multi platform games by now and suprisingly not a single developer had outspoken straight up saying "Y'know, MS pays us to nerf the PS3 ". Just because some blogs bubble and indugle in such provocative articles doesn't make it any truer.

There is no proof for or against, but the fact that nothing emerged after years in the generation, one would think that only the most gullible would believe in some stupid rumours.

The fact that you're still posting after such ridiculous accusations and just generally blinded outlook on things just goes to show how lax the moderating system is.

I'd argue with you, but I think I am better off just going to slap kittens or something.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

Around the Network
x_DMX_x on 16 October 2011
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
Yup im totally going to believe this guy.This coming from the guy who claimed that "the PS3 verison of the game was easy to develop because of blu-ray platform it will be one of the dominant versions"Now he does this.Not only that but Microsoft pays developers to have muliplat games look better on 360.So this is the biggest bullshit ive heard since Wii HD.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHhahhahahahaha

Ok you laugh but, can you answer this question?

Why does Killzone 3 look better than any Xbox360 game and why cant any Multiplat game look as good as Killzone 3.

Ive seen comparisons on youtube with Killzone vs Crysis and Killzone looks better.

So can you answer my question?

You obviously have no frigging clue and just slinging mud around, I am actually genuinely surprised you haven't been banned yet, 90 posts, that's probably the longest one of you have lasted with such an attitude.

"Games look better on multiplatform, so Microsoft bribe all developers! It's a conspiracy man!"

Get your tinfoil hat on, I think microsoft might be using their satellites to look into your brain and steal ideas for 1st party games.

Rofl...and whos to say M$ doesnt pay off developers?You dont know that.You dont work for them.

i dont know that either but, ive seen alot of legit articles saying they do.

Well maybe the fact that if they continued to engage in such distatestful tactics it would have emerged so by now? It's been like what, a good 500 if not even considerably more multi platform games by now and suprisingly not a single developer had outspoken straight up saying "Y'know, MS pays us to nerf the PS3 ". Just because some blogs bubble and indugle in such provocative articles doesn't make it any truer.

There is no proof for or against, but the fact that nothing emerged after years in the generation, one would think that only the most gullible would believe in some stupid rumours.

The fact that you're still posting after such ridiculous accusations and just generally blinded outlook on things just goes to show how lax the moderating system is.

I'd argue with you, but I think I am better off just going to slap kittens or something.

If slapping kittens makes you happy then go for it!



Porcupine_I on 16 October 2011

Does anyone realize that he said all of this more then two years ago?

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/220530/carmack-rage-runs-faster-on-xbox-360/



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Rainbow Yoshi on 16 October 2011

At least the PS3 version doesn't require three discs to play.



yo_john117 on 16 October 2011
youarebadatgames said:
60 fps responsive gameplay > 30 fps laggy shitty gameplay

That may be true but most PS3 games do not have "laggy, shitty gameplay"



Around the Network
yo_john117 on 16 October 2011
Rainbow Yoshi said:
At least the PS3 version doesn't require three discs to play.

Lets be honest. multiple discs is a non-issue if a developer does it right.



Grandia on 16 October 2011

The Xbox 360 is stronger than the PS3, John Carmack is not the first developer who said this. All the other good developer like crytek said the the same and all Games that run on Xbox 360 and PS3 have better graphics and run faster on the Xbox 360.



yo_john117 on 16 October 2011
Grandia said:
The Xbox 360 is stronger than the PS3, John Carmack is not the first developer who said this. All the other good developer like crytek said the the same and all Games that run on Xbox 360 and PS3 have better graphics and run faster on the Xbox 360.

No, no that's just not true.



NNN2004 on 16 October 2011

hmm i think hes right because the ps3 and xbox360 is have old technology now and they should be replaced soon.



forest-spirit on 16 October 2011

Gosh, people needs to calm down...I don't see how what he said is anywhere close to being overly harsh or something. He just said that the PS3 has limited memory and poor IO, and both are true. He didn't troll the PS3 in any way so I don't see the need to get so worked up about it.
As Rainbird has already said numerous times you can't just compare games like Uncharted with open-world games like Rage. It doesn't make any sense and if you had any game development knowledge you'd understand why.