Jesus Christ.

I knew that o.O.Q guy would be all over this thread. He just loves this kinda stuff.

"Aha! See? Nintendo isn't the only one who innovates! Other people do stuff too! In fact, Nintendo copies from other people! you Nintendo fans suck!"

let it go dude...

"Aha! See? Nintendo isn't the only one who innovates! Other people do stuff too! In fact, Nintendo copies from other people! you Nintendo fans suck!"

i don't get why you have quotes on that shit cuz i've never said anything like that... looks like you're the one who needs to let go if you're going to start putting words in my mouth...

now that i think on it you're the same guy who ( unprovoked ) posted some nonsense on my wall... and i'm the one who needs to let go apparently...

lol

yeah give him what he wants so he can sleep tonight man

Has the writer of the article used the Wii U? Or read anything about it? The device described in that patent is no more related to the Wii U than any handheld device with a camera on the rear; Wii U, 3DS, DSi, iphone, ipad, pretty much any other smartphone or tablet, and even a lot of non smart phones.

Look at the picture. This technology requires you to point the small screen at a section of the tv screen, and it shows you the part of the tv screen that you are pointing at, and then overlays stuff on top. i.e. it lets you use the second screen to find hidden objects, such as the ghost in the picture. They did not patent the use of a screen on your controller, that would be too general to count as a patent. What they did patent was a very specific form of gameplay along the lines of AR games like invisimals.

There are similarities but I don't see patent infringement happening, it just seems too vague to me.

lol I love these threads...mainly cuz of the double standards that just come oozing out.

while true motion tech was around before Ninty and Sony made theres pluse there 2 different principles behind both motion controls which makes them different. Sony's use led light and i'm not sure about Ninty but there has to be some difference or someone had it before both and they paid them off lol. hey they may have already settled out of court?

yea a flame war. 2007 all over again right. time will tell. not sure it would end well. could have a real negative effect seeing 90% of VGC getting permabanned.