Seece said:
ethomaz said:
Seece said:
ethomaz said:
So why I have not messed up about it? Just wait and see. I will track the adjustments just for you .
|
What? If you're going to reply to me at least make it coherant, I don't even understand that.
You don't need to track anything for me, it could well be overtracked, .... or undertracked. Or just right. But you have zero resources. You simply don't like the numbers, so it's a hunch.
|
Sorry I don't know how to say what I want to say... something like "I've never been wrong about that." but lighter.
And BHR always is right too... so you have to provide evidence to the contrary .
|
BHR isn't always right, he just likes to bury all his ridiclous predictions, like infamous 2 doing 4 mill lifetime.
Maybe if you just put it in your native language, I'll use a translater
|
still bringing up the same old one "post" i see http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4069668
maybe cause your to yella to post in my recent thread which i know you have doubts about or b/c thats all you got, dont worry though you'll get another chance to redeem yourself for your Uncharted 2 failure which was a double wammy failure for you as you even got gears involved in it to
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=2628832
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=2628739
to my defense i dont claim that my posts will result correct outcomes post are more to be reckless and past the time on here since the forums have been slow as of late, its the threads ive made that i have confidence with and can guarantee accuracy. if you read the post i clearly state that i dont like making predictions for games series i havent played, you also can clearly see that i nailed its FW even though many in the thread had over 400k, it also clearly states 3-4M LT since the original ones stands at over 2M currently believing the 2nd one to hit over a 1M on that wouldnt be a bias prediction as you stated