By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - OBAMA approval PLUMMETS to a dreadful 40%

Viper1 said:
thx1139 said:
Viper1 said:
I'm not actually talking about elite private doctors that are on call for the rich but the average hospital facility or even family doctor is over all the highest quality in the world. The access to most everyone with insurance to see medical field specialists for just about every malady imaginable is invaluable compared to many countries that roll up a doctor into multiple fields. The downside is that greatly increases the costs.

More to the point, the average American citizen has access to the best healthcare in the world in terms of quality. But it comes at a nasty cost which is bloated far beyond what it needs to be thanks to the removal of free market economics.

Rich americans, because Insurance companies dont work that way.  I am picking a 100% common health care need. Friends of ours lived in Brussels for a number of years. There third child was born in Brussels.  The experience was vastly different than what a US patient goes through.  I have had 3 children and all 3 were cessarian births.  We did not stay in the hospital more than 4 days from the time we checked in until the time we checked out. It is very common in the US for a mother and child to be out of the hospital within 2 days of giving birth.  Our friends experience in Brussels was vastly different. With a normal birth the mother and child stayed in the hospital for a week. Then for another couple weeks they had a nurse come by everyday to assist.  In the US that is healthcare that the rich get. Insurance companies dont work that way. They want you out as soon as possible no matter what.

That's a fascinating anecdote and I'd love to see that kind of birthing care here but unfortunately we could swap anecdotes all day and get nowhere.

What I'm referencing is a commonly accepted and verfied understanding that the average quaity of care in the US is of a higher standard than anywhere else in the world.  Might there be cases were one nation takes a segment of healthcare very seriously and outdoes the US?  Certainly, but on the whole average is where these considerations come from.

But it's the costs above all that are the main issue.  The quality differnces are minor enough that it's hardly worth debating about.   It's the costs and the measures in place that keep them artificially high that are of concern.


Ever been to a US hospital ?

Because his exemple is not annecdotal.

Whenever you do need to go to a hospital the hospital will keep you as long as insurance pays and kick you out once it won't. In the end the decision of how long you stay has very little to do with your health status...

 

Anyway I spent the first 30 years of my life in France and the last 10 here and I would pick the french system over the american one any time of the day............

 

900$ for a root canal ? Seriously, Are you F**ing kidding me ?



PS3-Xbox360 gap : 1.5 millions and going up in PS3 favor !

PS3-Wii gap : 20 millions and going down !

Around the Network
Ail said:
Viper1 said:
thx1139 said:

Rich americans, because Insurance companies dont work that way.  I am picking a 100% common health care need. Friends of ours lived in Brussels for a number of years. There third child was born in Brussels.  The experience was vastly different than what a US patient goes through.  I have had 3 children and all 3 were cessarian births.  We did not stay in the hospital more than 4 days from the time we checked in until the time we checked out. It is very common in the US for a mother and child to be out of the hospital within 2 days of giving birth.  Our friends experience in Brussels was vastly different. With a normal birth the mother and child stayed in the hospital for a week. Then for another couple weeks they had a nurse come by everyday to assist.  In the US that is healthcare that the rich get. Insurance companies dont work that way. They want you out as soon as possible no matter what.

That's a fascinating anecdote and I'd love to see that kind of birthing care here but unfortunately we could swap anecdotes all day and get nowhere.

What I'm referencing is a commonly accepted and verfied understanding that the average quaity of care in the US is of a higher standard than anywhere else in the world.  Might there be cases were one nation takes a segment of healthcare very seriously and outdoes the US?  Certainly, but on the whole average is where these considerations come from.

But it's the costs above all that are the main issue.  The quality differnces are minor enough that it's hardly worth debating about.   It's the costs and the measures in place that keep them artificially high that are of concern.


Ever been to a US hospital ?

Because his exemple is not annecdotal.

See the bold part?  That's an anecdote.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

cloud1161 said:
someone please correct me if im wrong, but the lowest i remember george w bush was 46%. i am no politician so it could be lower.

The approval rating for GW Bush dropped to around 30% if not lower.  As his second term reached an end, there was massive numbers of people sick of him and what was going on.  McCain got his campaign sunk by seeming to be to close in policies to the last administration.



Bush Jr dropped to 30% at the lowest but Truman and Nixon fell to 21% for the record for lowest rating in modern times. Interestingly, Bush Jr and Truman are also tied for the the highest peak rating approval at 86%.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Viper1 said:
Ail said:
Viper1 said:
thx1139 said:

Rich americans, because Insurance companies dont work that way.  I am picking a 100% common health care need. Friends of ours lived in Brussels for a number of years. There third child was born in Brussels.  The experience was vastly different than what a US patient goes through.  I have had 3 children and all 3 were cessarian births.  We did not stay in the hospital more than 4 days from the time we checked in until the time we checked out. It is very common in the US for a mother and child to be out of the hospital within 2 days of giving birth.  Our friends experience in Brussels was vastly different. With a normal birth the mother and child stayed in the hospital for a week. Then for another couple weeks they had a nurse come by everyday to assist.  In the US that is healthcare that the rich get. Insurance companies dont work that way. They want you out as soon as possible no matter what.

That's a fascinating anecdote and I'd love to see that kind of birthing care here but unfortunately we could swap anecdotes all day and get nowhere.

What I'm referencing is a commonly accepted and verfied understanding that the average quaity of care in the US is of a higher standard than anywhere else in the world.  Might there be cases were one nation takes a segment of healthcare very seriously and outdoes the US?  Certainly, but on the whole average is where these considerations come from.

But it's the costs above all that are the main issue.  The quality differnces are minor enough that it's hardly worth debating about.   It's the costs and the measures in place that keep them artificially high that are of concern.


Ever been to a US hospital ?

Because his exemple is not annecdotal.

See the bold part?  That's an anecdote.

Well this isnt anecdotal this is me. My middle son is ADHD.  It took awhile to diagnose because of his level of intelligence, but although he has an IQ close to 140 he had issues completing assignments.  School never thought he had ADHD because he has performed well despite his ADHD.  So someone finally referred us to a local specialist.  Well she does not accept Insurance because they try to tell her what to charge.  This is typical of the higher end specialists. They have no need to take patients that use Insurance. Of course Blue Cross Blue Shield would pay for part of the treatments and testing.  So we ended up being reimbursed about 1/3rd of the cost.  The remainder wasnt even counted as part of the deductible.  Now the thing is I can afford it.  I can also afford the fact that between deductible, premiums and employer premiums my family of 5 pays nearly $20,000 for Blue Cross Blue Sheild and we are a healthy family (my son doesnt even need meds for his ADHD).  Still with 3 athletic active boys we have our share of trips to immediate care, physicals, flu, etc.  Now dont tell me that on average our citizens get above average healthcare.

With some 50 million of our 307 million citizens without health insurance that brings the average down real fast.  Then take into account that even the deductible are very hard on the average family.  Think about it someone that has a salary and benefit package of $80,000 is paying 25% of that for health insurance.  As leadership in our company the only thing that stopped us from dropping health insurance and bumping employees salaries was the fact we would be perceived and not competitive even though our salaries would be higher.  Also think about the extra work and effort we had to manage every year with enrollments and negotiating with the insurance companies.  Work that did not add anything at all to our business.  Our offshore competitors simply dont need to do this.



Its libraries that sell systems not a single game.

Around the Network

So will his numbers rise now that we've got an agreement?

Asian markets reacted positively, and our markets likely will on the morrow



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

THX, that is still anecdotal. An anecdote just means a personal story.

See, you have BCBS and pay $1,666 per month for your family's health insurance. But did you get to shop around for that insurance? Did you get to check competitors? Or were you forced to be stuck with that insurance?

When businesses like insurance are given monopolistic opportunities that are backed by the government combined with cost ballooning measures also because of government intervention, you get high costs.

Those 50 million without insurance can usually get government funded insurance with the same access to the same health care professionals and treatments (mostly) as your overly expensive corporate package.

Get it all out of the way and let the market find a balance. Like I've noted before. Look at Lasik surgery. It's getting cheaper and much more accurate. Same with ALL elective cosmetic surgeries and procedures. How do they manage to reduce costs and increase quality? Government isn't involved...nor are most insurance carriers.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

osamanobama said:

then thats the exception not the rule. my sister and her husband make ~40k a year, and she has had 2 cessarians, and both times she stayed in the for 4+ days.

had nurses by her side the whole time, and had a room to herself, was served served food etc. and i wouldnt take any healthcare system in the world over ours.

You see what you are comparing.

Staying in the hospital for a C-section for 4+ days to a natural birth staying in a hospital for a full week.  Also not being disturbed constantly.  It was more of a hotel stay with Dr's and Nurse's at the ready. Then weeks of at home assistance. These nurses did all sorts of things for the patient including cooking and cleaning.  They were amazed at how well they were taken care of compared to her 1st 2 children born in the US. Also remember they werent even citizens. Her husbands company sent him over their to work.

Also take a look at this thread. A thread where moms are comparing thier length of stays. The longest I saw was 1 that was 5 days. Most of them were 2-3. http://community.babycenter.com/post/a12034535/c-section_how_long_was_hospital_stay



Its libraries that sell systems not a single game.

Viper1 said:
THX, that is still anecdotal. An anecdote just means a personal story.

See, you have BCBS and pay $1,666 per month for your family's health insurance. But did you get to shop around for that insurance? Did you get to check competitors? Or were you forced to be stuck with that insurance?

When businesses like insurance are given monopolistic opportunities that are backed by the government combined with cost ballooning measures also because of government intervention, you get high costs.

Those 50 million without insurance can usually get government funded insurance with the same access to the same health care professionals and treatments (mostly) as your overly expensive corporate package.

Get it all out of the way and let the market find a balance. Like I've noted before. Look at Lasik surgery. It's getting cheaper and much more accurate. Same with ALL elective cosmetic surgeries and procedures. How do they manage to reduce costs and increase quality? Government isn't involved...nor are most insurance carriers.

The $20K is the combined employer, employee, and deductible all added up for the year.  As I mentioned before Insurance Companies do not like competition so they charge a premium if you want to offer plans from multiple companies. When I first started working in the 80's I worked at Amoco and they offered plans from like 10 companies. Now they offer like 2. 

You fooling yourself if you think that the 50 million can easily get government funded insurance.

Also hear is a study of marketshare of health insurance in the US. 21 of 50 states have 1 company controlling over 50% of the market.  Also note that state after state is dominated by 1 of just a few companies.  http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/06/pdf/health_competitiveness.pdf



Its libraries that sell systems not a single game.

thx1139 said:

Also hear is a study of marketshare of health insurance in the US. 21 of 50 states have 1 company controlling over 50% of the market.  Also note that state after state is dominated by 1 of just a few companies.  http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/06/pdf/health_competitiveness.pdf


That's because it is federally mandated that you cannot buy insurance across state lines so it makes very little business sense to establish your insurance carrier in a new state if it's already locked up by someone else.   Would you want to have to create an entire replication of your business in each state just to serve a small portion of the potential customer base?

I told you, the government involvement has crushed the entire concept of free competition.



The rEVOLution is not being televised