Seece said:
Black_Scurge said:
Seece said:
Black_Scurge said:
VXIII said:
What they are saying is right , it's fair to count all the sales of Microsoft published games for after the PS3 was released , even if the game itself was launched before the PS3 , you can use VGchartz data , it's time consuming I know , if you don't want to do it just say it for everyone and they will understand .... I hope :p
|
That's the thing it isn't fair, look at it this way right now MS and Sony both have exactly 4 years 9 months and 14 days worth of games, if I include games released before ps3 that gives MS 5 years 9 months and 9 days worth of games, and Sony 4 years 9 months and 14 days, how is that fair?
|
What arnt you getting 0_o, it's not giving MS any extra time at all. You're NOT including that extra years worth of sales, only the sales AFTER the PS3 launched, so they both get 4 years 9 months worth of sales.
My mind is made up, you're definitely doing this so PS3 wins.
|
No however you look at it I'd be including an extra years worth of games
|
It doesn't matter, you're not including its sales for that year so the fact they came out a year earlier is irrelevent. Not to mention (again) Gears of War and Viva Pinata came out 1 week before PS3 launched, so what's the difference between those and PS3 launch games? 1 Week. Ridiculous.
If you're not gonna do a fair comparison don't do one at all, these kinda threads get locked for that reason.
|
Yes it does matter, it gives MS more games then they published in the same timeframe as Sony how does adding extra games not matter? Right now they both have the EXACT same restrictions, published by the respective company after the exact same date on their respective current gen consoles, if I add sales from games publsihed by one company before the date and not the other it makes things unfair, the only thing more fair then what I'm doing would be to chop off all sales of all MS published 360 games in the last year minus 5 days and compare it to what I have for Sony on ps3 now