Silver-Tiger said:
Which part of my comments left you with a scum vibe?
|
Besides what I perceived to be slip:
You FoSed TOS for 'bandwagoning' without doing the same for Heph, who by his own admission was pretty much just like TOS.(And wouldn't you know Sabby did the same thing)
While there was a decent amount of discussion going on and you were a fair contender for getting lynched, you point to Baal and Sabby as being suspicious. Especially now that Baal has flipped town, it feels like trying to redirect town's focus.
You took the 'safe and easy' No Lynch route, and your explanation for waiting doesn't feel genuine. If you wanted to vote a day earlier, then you should have. Unless you were going to hide afterwards like you accused Baal of doing, then there's nothing that would have stopped you from commenting or voting differently if "something meaningful" came up.
You felt the need to say absolutely nothing after radish was chastised for it.
With the reread and more thinking on your hesitation to vote radish, the thing that stands out most is:
radishhead said:
Of the people that have voted me, I may have to choose one of you to prove my loyalty to the town.
|
Now my belief is you hesitated to vote because you wanted radish to kill one or more of the people voting him. I would guess there was at most 1 mafia on that lynch before hat hammered, which would give you good odds of a townie being killed and radish still being lynched as a consequence. I'll admit that my reasoning is somewhat circular since I also believe sabby is scum and so this theory would fit perfectly, but even if it were 2 mafia and 4 townies on the lynch it's still more likely than not that an extra townie would die.
Finally, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4126238 and http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4126375 are so horrible. First, what is "My analysis was based on the fact that it is important to me has such behaviour, although it doesn't matter yet for me." supposed to mean? Next, Baal being dead only proves your point if Baal was chosen for being quiet and being a probable power role, and not because Baal was unlikely to be protected or watched as TOS pointed out, which you could only know if you were mafia. Then you bring me up, which I'm assuming is trying to buddy up to me as a means of convincing me I've got the wrong read. Fat chance, I'd say you're hoping that post will be used against me down the line. Lastly, there seems to be way too much repetition that the "opinions" seem forced.