Silver-Tiger said:
Linkzmax said:
Silver-Tiger said:
radishhead said: I'm sure that most of us secretly want a no lynch result today. It's simply not worth the risk at this early stage of the game |
heh, you nailed it.
Vote: No lynch
Note that radishs comment didn't convince me to vote No lynch, I wanted to do that since yesterday(IRL) already.
|
So why did you wait until after the deadline had passed to finally do so?
|
There's no reason really. I just wanted to see if something meaningful comes up, but so far nothing has striked me so far, although theprof's comment really annoyed me. I'll keep an eye on him from now on, he fell under my radar before. Come to think of it, his playstyle changed dramatically from last game. He's acting way more cautious, posts less...
|
You're right to think that I'm mafia based on that post. While I'm not the type of player to write misleading posts in an attempt to slander and vote-train a player, I am the type to do so in an attempt to clear me of being scummake by making everyone think that I'm not the type to intentionally mislead using "less than vague", easily dismissable evidence. As a bonus, I guess it would also help me recognize the sheep that decide to vote alongside myself, as well as possibly cause a mislynch.
Should that be your point, I completely agree. I also find it necessary to point out that it's a lot more logical than me simply losing interest, leading me to misremember my original criticism that I had written roughly 24 hours earlier here