That's true. It's a very common symptom of Borderline Personality Disorder, specifically. BPD diagnosees are the most manipulative people you'll ever meet, and they love to feel superior over others.

Still, in this case at least, kber81 seemed like the superiority-complex type. Maybe GGE is just the victim of bad circumstance. 

kber makes some valid points.....

Kber should have never been banned, what are the mods blind or something? Everyone knows who GGE is.

I agree Kber didn't deserve to be banned for this thread, but that ban may have been for another thread.

Girl Gamer Elite said:
Of course catgirls aren't real kber, I just like the art. And how could "catwomen" be sexually attracted to me if they aren't real? I find the pictures cute, innocent fun. I'm not sure why you think it is some sort of reality blurring dimented fantasy. Pictures are only pictures Kber.

I hate to dissapoint you Kber but, Catgirls aren't real. ;)
 

Your explanation of Kber seemed mostly spot-on to me GGE, while his of you was angry nonsense, but posts like yours above just make you sound stupid anyways.

Pictures can be of anything, and if you take them to heart, there's nothing that says they can't be "reality blurring demented fantasies." In fact, if it's pictures of something not real, that makes them fantasy, and if you are, let us say, doing something very real and biological in responce to those pictures, then it would seem you are blurring reality. But you glazed over all of that to say "pictures are only pictures," and end up by turning around and informing Kber that catgirls aren't real, as if he cares about them beyond mocking you.

I won't assume you are doing anything "very real and biological in responce to those pictures," but judging by the physique, the poses and the state of dress of those characters, I'm betting that is part of the intent of them. And if you are, you would be better off pointing out that everyone blurs reality, but few are comfortable and confident enough in themselves to do it knowingly and willfully as you do. Right?

Afterall, only those who are uncomfortable with their "reality blurring demented fantasies," but are giving into them, would need to promote their normalcy to feel better about themselves. If someone, for example, had a catgirl fetish, and was totally comfortable with it, they wouldn't need to run to an anonymous place like the internet to share pictures and start threads about it, all while making fun of more common and realistic fetishes like anal sex. So I'm sure you post pictures of hair-covered women with cat faces in sexually suggestive attire and poses every chance you get because you think it is "cute," "innocent" and "fun," and you want others to appriciate it as "art."

Ah, come on guys, just let it go. If there are people who like people who look like cats, catwomen, women cats, human animals, humans with animal characteristics or whatever, let them. There's just some sick people who take it too far, but that doesn't mean they all do. Come on.

Erik, the purpose of my statement was that of redirected sarcasm to diffuse Kber's asinine attack, not to be taken literally.

Pictures are just pictures and I'm sorry you or anyone else is under the impression that they're some sort of reality blurring fantasy for me. It was simply a thread to provoke responses from others in regards to their opinions of Xenomorphism and hypothetical fantasies.

Kber was the one who turned this into a mud-slinging contest by attacking me and the subject matter of this thread in such a childish and petty way. It was Kber that chose to make this thread an issue about sexual acts and personal depravity. This thread was never about homosexuality, zoophilia, roleplaying or furry. It was just a, "Hey, if what unique type of theriomorphism do you like?" (Furry is Anthropomorphism by the way).

I merely made a thread that was to be hypothetical and fun with no indication of any of the said possibilities being real or possible. I assumed that anyone with a semblence of social prowess would be aware of the innocent interests many people have for such fictional women common in literature, anime, cinema and so forth. Almost immediately though the thread and myself were attacked, you will forgive me for defending myself. But if any of my posts sound "stupid" I can only assure you I was responding in due kind to an offending individual.

The same people who think this thread is about "Furries" are the same people who don't really know what Furry is. The people who denounce this thread or vindictively proclaim they would only ever be attracted to "normal" women are all too eager to make sure you know they're not into this "stuff". All the negative reactions to this thread have been the product of immaturity and ignorance.

VgChartz drama all over again.. Can't I get a nice new year's eve?

Here's one that I wish was real <3:

Julie Newmar. Meow! 

Good Call Lolita, very much of the Vampire Hunter D category wouldn't you say?