mysticwolf said:
The 3DS was not meant to be bricked. Therefore, it isn't Nintendo's fault, or their problem, if one decides to take a risk by bricking it. If it is used the way it is supposed to be used, then it should not need to be bricked and/or repaired. In what kind of situation might it need to be bricked? p.s. i don't really know what Im talking about |
Well they seem to be thinking Nintendo's saying "we reserve the right to brick your system whenever we damn well please," which in purely legal terms is true, but it's one of those matters of legal binding that cannot be applied (like the parts of the PSN's EULA regarding what you can and can't do to your PS3 which are not legally binding even if you agree to them), because it violates basic consumer protection concepts.
But Nintendo's not going to be maliciously bricking pirated consoles, or i damn well hope they don't as that would be quite evil of them, Nintendo's just saying if you modify the firmware in such a way that an unforeseen (and unprepared for) incompatibility arises with official software updates, you can't sue Nintendo, though i believe that if you got a good enough lawyer, you probably could, because they share at least partial responsibility for the bricking if it comes from their update (i.e. you did not brick it directly by putting homebrew on. They did not brick it directly by sending their update out, but the two interacted in such a way as it was bricked, and therefore Nintendo assumes partial responsibility for destroying your personal property)

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.












