The term AAA** belongs to the games with the highest budgets and the only companies which will be able to afford them are third parties who can whore the development costs over multiple systems and somehow swing the $50M#2b development costs on a consistant basis and with really big productions easily topping over $150M, Call of Duty 11 anyone?
Nintendo made the third parties look bad because they split the market share down the middle 50:50. On the other hand they also made exclusives look good because third parties could only sell to between two consoles and theres a reasonable overlap with multi console ownership. If Nintendo makes third parties look good then third parties will make exclusives look bad because they'll pay for far more advertising and they will be able to afford a far larger art budget.
*Unless one console manufacturer gets >60% market share.
**Nintendo games are 'arty' and therefore will be cheap enough to make because they had the foresight to design their games in a way that they could scale to the next generation without incurring major cost increases. They won't count as AAA games.
Tease.








Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."


