Viper1 said:
That's because too many people were under the impression that seal "of quality" was given as an approval measure of the subjective quality of the game instead of an approval measure of the quality of construction as it really meant. |
Yeah, I know. I played too many shitty games for the Nes to ever believe that he Nintendo Seal of Quality meant that I was buying a fun game. How the heck could Nintendo guarntee something that's subjective? I was just pointing out the change in terminology.
