Foamer on 12 May 2011
Seeing as my comment under the review has been repeatedly removed, I thought I'd ask in here.
Did the reviewer experience any of the technical issues outlined by Ars Technica, which refused to review the game as it was so obviously broken? Given that Ars Technica mentioned that reviewers were only given copies of the 360 version of Brink, did the reviewer also get PS3 and PC copies? If not, then why are there reviews for those versions?
I posted this as a new thread few hours ago, it got deleted again. I assume if this also gets deleted that VGChartz aren't interested in having transparent reviews and any trust you have in their reviews should be taken with a huge pinch of salt.
