sega4life said: OP - You seem to be one of the few people that keep bringing this topic up, this is the second thread you made in two days about PS3 doomed and has no games. Don't know why you keep bringing it up, but that thread was locked and this one is about to follow. I can say when working at Gamestop from the time the console came out, till the time it got a library that people actually wanted to enjoy; it was a long wait. Thats why Sony made the push for more first party games. I can remember that games were getting pushed back on the system Constantly, and that devs complained it was to hard to develop for, that was why games didn't not come out, or why they were pushed back. Theres no denying the PS3 had no games, that's how the term came to be used. I do not remember the term being used so much in 2009, but it was greatly used in 2007 and 2008. |
the thread yesterday had nothing to do with this one.
it was a joke because when i was checking game sales, something was really wrong with the ps3 game sales.
and i thought it would be funny to post that.
this thread came up because someone i was debating with said that the ps3 had no games before 2009. so i decided to look up how many exclusive it really had. So i did, and it turned out PS3 had tons of games with 80 plus scores before that time. i dont know why you are at all agravated by this thread.
sony had lots of great exclusives in 2006, 2007, and 2008. and of course in 2009, 2010, and 2011.
thats the point of this thread. whats wrong with that?