Yep sure did, as mentioned in a previous post. It's not RAGE engine. Might be a derivative of it though. Makes my buying decision easier.

thankyou? i guess. you reinforced me saying DF said the xbox version was better

L A Noire was a PS3 exclusive and all the footage shown is PS3. People still think its going to look bad on the PS3?

It will look better on the PS3 if anything. Lots of multi-plats this year are looking or performing better on the PS3. Multiplats are no longer an issue.

Also the triple DVDs are obviously not much of an issue, I mean, unless the game is 5 hours long, it won't be an issue. However I doubt it will be as long as Mass effect 2 which is like 40 hours long if you do everything. And have to swap discs twice mandatory, no saving to the HDD will help.

i think what he means as there are constants on all the disks, as an example, the main characters textures and expressions must be saved on all disks because they'll be called upon from all disks.

another example would be an overworld map. to work in a video game (like final fantasy 7) the overworld map has to be compelete on all disks so each final fantasy 7 disk only had like 400mb of space (out of 700mb) to put actual content because the data had to be redundant across all the disks to ensure you could travel wherever you wanted at whatever point in the game

without being redundant across disks in this case you would either require no exploration to places you have previously been to (final fantasy 13) or disk swapping to access places that you had previously been to (mass effect 2).

yea lol, i just read your post, i replied back before going through and reading, oops! thanks!

Let's say you had to swap disc from 1 to 2.  There is common data that has to be on all discs for the game to properly function.  If tha data of the main controlled charatcer is NOT on discs 2 and discs 3, how would you control the same main character?  You can't.  Now sometimes the same data is also repeated on a single blu-ray to help reduce seek time.  That depends on the programming and programmers.  But if you are controlling the main character throughout a three disc (DVD) game, you have to have three time the same data amongst three discs as opposed to it once on one DVD and possibly one Blu-ray.  Therefore, your total space amongst multiple DVD's are not used as effectively.

Haha, yeah I saw that. It was Nsanity's fault though as he was being difficult.

2 discs kinda sucks. Haven't played ME2 yet but I thought u could move freely and backtrack a lot in that game, so that would require disc swapping.

And 3 discs in an open worldish game sounds even more worrying.

6.8 (available space on 360 disc) x 3  = 20.4 < 25 gigs (single layer bluray).

Look at the post I am quoting in the tree.

Stupid vgc -__-

"when it mentions side missions, it seems to allude to that if you wanted to complete some of them, you would need to swap disk more than twice. " 

No, I wasn't... I was agreeing with him. They could of just made it a multi-layer blu-ray to add more content, as well as just adding a new DVD.