theprof00 said:
again, I'm not disputing that. I agree that they were behind on their defense. What I'm saying is, just because the lock on my front door is "accessible with the right key", mean that all burglars have that key. Maybe my door has an eye scanner. Some thug might have an eye-scanner hack, but chances are they don't. Yaknow what I mean? Anyway, it doesn't matter. The most important thing is why this is happening now, and why credit card companies haven't seen any wierd access. I believe this is just a message from a very pro hacker. Look, just because some guy can run his own fake server in his house and see what information is being sent and where it's going, it doesn't mean that anyone can access the database. Things being said "in theory" doesn't equal them being easy to do. |
not sure what you sayinga bout eye scanner and lock. worded confusing.
but what i was saying was that doesn't matter how many locks, dead bolts, eye scanners, finger print scanners, voice recognition ect that a place may have. There is a chance, just like Mission Impossible that there is a flaw somewhere and someone will get in eventually.
Now what i'm saying is that Sony was moronic in that they did not have their information encrypted at all once someone got in. Its like the burgler in your case got past all the security measures fo the lock, eye scan ect, and then when he got in teh house all the money was just sitting on the table. THe homeowner should put that money ALSO inside a safe inside the house. Or in sony's case, have it encrypted.
