EdStation3 said:
|
How can you say buy 2nd place when Sony has subsidized much more their console.
EdStation3 said:
|
How can you say buy 2nd place when Sony has subsidized much more their console.
RolStoppable said:
I hope for your sake that you are doing this deliberately. |
Maybe. May not. 
EdStation3 said:
|
You forgot the part where Sony has lost money on the Playstation 3 while Microsoft is somewhere close to break-even on the 360.
"Buying", indeed.

Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/
| rocketpig said: Why does it matter? Microsoft has made more money than Sony this generation. Why don't we go by THAT number? It makes more sense than arbitrarily looking at product sales, which don't account for the clusterfucks that have set back both companies quite a bit (MS less than Sony but they both had major mistakes this generation). |
it matters because this is a thread about sales, not profits. But if spinning and twisting topic is gonna make you happy, than go on :)
pizzahut451 said:
it matters because this is a thread about sales, not profits. But if spinning and twisting topic is gonna make you happy, than go on :) |
The one who has twisted and spinned logic is the Op.
1) That is not what 'per capita' means. Sales per capita would be comparing the average number of 360's owned by each 360 owner to the average number of PS3's owned by PS3 owners. Ima guess both are approximately 1.
2) Responding to the actual question, I think you'll find it's not as simple as that. Aligning sales for the purpose of comparison is only useful for a very short period of time, a matter of months. Lets imagine that the PS3 had launched one year earlier. It would have been priced even higher than it was, and there would have been fewer and worse games ready for it. Or consider if MS had delayed the 360 by 1 year, certainly RROD would have been avoided, and there would have been more time to cut costs on hardware and develop games.
If we do an aligned launch comparison, then the PS3 gets to keep its advantage, but we are eliminating the 360's advantage. No, I'm afraid that in the twilight of the generation, using aligned launches is simply a way of biasing the figures to make it look like one's favourite console is winning.
Kynes said:
|
How exaclty? he is talking about sales, not profits, and I know many people here would rather jum off a building before seeing Sony achieveing anything better compared to competition, but we can at least stick to the topic, cant we?
| Ajescent said: It's weird when Rol gets all serious... |
I gotta admit, it's turning me on!
d21lewis said:
|
I know right?!