By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Emily Rogers reveals rumours she got from sources.

superchunk said:
Munkeh111 said:
 

Well it's minimum power will be PS360 level, so the easy thing to do for devs will be to take those games

But I think we all know that Sony and M$ will blow Nintendo out of the water in terms of power


I disagree.

You need to read my other Nintendo thread (see link in sig), but MSony have learned a valuable lesson about $600 consoles that sell for a loss vs $250 systems that sell for a profit and are marginal upgrades from last gen.

MSony will only show a 5-6x performance increase over this gen as compared to the 10-15x they saw against last gen. They will want to launch around $400 max with a profitable or near profitable system (no $200plus loss per item).

They won't want to wait 3 or more years to begin making a profit on the hardware. They will want to be at that level immediately or within its first year.

Well they will almost certainly not be out until 2013, so that will make easier to beat Nintendo in a power perspective



Around the Network
Munkeh111 said:
superchunk said:
Munkeh111 said:
 

Well it's minimum power will be PS360 level, so the easy thing to do for devs will be to take those games

But I think we all know that Sony and M$ will blow Nintendo out of the water in terms of power


I disagree.

You need to read my other Nintendo thread (see link in sig), but MSony have learned a valuable lesson about $600 consoles that sell for a loss vs $250 systems that sell for a profit and are marginal upgrades from last gen.

MSony will only show a 5-6x performance increase over this gen as compared to the 10-15x they saw against last gen. They will want to launch around $400 max with a profitable or near profitable system (no $200plus loss per item).

They won't want to wait 3 or more years to begin making a profit on the hardware. They will want to be at that level immediately or within its first year.

Well they will almost certainly not be out until 2013, so that will make easier to beat Nintendo in a power perspective


Not significantly. That's the point.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

LordTheNightKnight said:
Munkeh111 said:
superchunk said:
Munkeh111 said:
 

Well it's minimum power will be PS360 level, so the easy thing to do for devs will be to take those games

But I think we all know that Sony and M$ will blow Nintendo out of the water in terms of power


I disagree.

You need to read my other Nintendo thread (see link in sig), but MSony have learned a valuable lesson about $600 consoles that sell for a loss vs $250 systems that sell for a profit and are marginal upgrades from last gen.

MSony will only show a 5-6x performance increase over this gen as compared to the 10-15x they saw against last gen. They will want to launch around $400 max with a profitable or near profitable system (no $200plus loss per item).

They won't want to wait 3 or more years to begin making a profit on the hardware. They will want to be at that level immediately or within its first year.

Well they will almost certainly not be out until 2013, so that will make easier to beat Nintendo in a power perspective


Not significantly. That's the point.

Yeah power is becoming irrelevant as I doubt most publishers will invest the amount of money needed to max the new consoles.

A more relevant issue is going to be things like the amount of RAM available on those new machines.

Because if one comes out with 512Mb and the others with 1gb that is going to make multiplatform development a bigger pain...



PS3-Xbox360 gap : 1.5 millions and going up in PS3 favor !

PS3-Wii gap : 20 millions and going down !

LordTheNightKnight said:
Munkeh111 said:
superchunk said:
Munkeh111 said:
 

Well it's minimum power will be PS360 level, so the easy thing to do for devs will be to take those games

But I think we all know that Sony and M$ will blow Nintendo out of the water in terms of power


I disagree.

You need to read my other Nintendo thread (see link in sig), but MSony have learned a valuable lesson about $600 consoles that sell for a loss vs $250 systems that sell for a profit and are marginal upgrades from last gen.

MSony will only show a 5-6x performance increase over this gen as compared to the 10-15x they saw against last gen. They will want to launch around $400 max with a profitable or near profitable system (no $200plus loss per item).

They won't want to wait 3 or more years to begin making a profit on the hardware. They will want to be at that level immediately or within its first year.

Well they will almost certainly not be out until 2013, so that will make easier to beat Nintendo in a power perspective


Not significantly. That's the point.

Not the Wii divide, but still significant I believe



Ail said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Munkeh111 said:
superchunk said:
Munkeh111 said:
 

Well it's minimum power will be PS360 level, so the easy thing to do for devs will be to take those games

But I think we all know that Sony and M$ will blow Nintendo out of the water in terms of power


I disagree.

You need to read my other Nintendo thread (see link in sig), but MSony have learned a valuable lesson about $600 consoles that sell for a loss vs $250 systems that sell for a profit and are marginal upgrades from last gen.

MSony will only show a 5-6x performance increase over this gen as compared to the 10-15x they saw against last gen. They will want to launch around $400 max with a profitable or near profitable system (no $200plus loss per item).

They won't want to wait 3 or more years to begin making a profit on the hardware. They will want to be at that level immediately or within its first year.

Well they will almost certainly not be out until 2013, so that will make easier to beat Nintendo in a power perspective


Not significantly. That's the point.

Yeah power is becoming irrelevant as I doubt most publishers will invest the amount of money needed to max the new consoles.

A more relevant issue is going to be things like the amount of RAM available on those new machines.

Because if one comes out with 512Mb and the others with 1gb that is going to make multiplatform development a bigger pain...


Not unless you take the lower system as a source. That did happen on the PS2. Remember?



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight said:
Ail said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Munkeh111 said:
superchunk said:
Munkeh111 said:
 

Well it's minimum power will be PS360 level, so the easy thing to do for devs will be to take those games

But I think we all know that Sony and M$ will blow Nintendo out of the water in terms of power


I disagree.

You need to read my other Nintendo thread (see link in sig), but MSony have learned a valuable lesson about $600 consoles that sell for a loss vs $250 systems that sell for a profit and are marginal upgrades from last gen.

MSony will only show a 5-6x performance increase over this gen as compared to the 10-15x they saw against last gen. They will want to launch around $400 max with a profitable or near profitable system (no $200plus loss per item).

They won't want to wait 3 or more years to begin making a profit on the hardware. They will want to be at that level immediately or within its first year.

Well they will almost certainly not be out until 2013, so that will make easier to beat Nintendo in a power perspective


Not significantly. That's the point.

Yeah power is becoming irrelevant as I doubt most publishers will invest the amount of money needed to max the new consoles.

A more relevant issue is going to be things like the amount of RAM available on those new machines.

Because if one comes out with 512Mb and the others with 1gb that is going to make multiplatform development a bigger pain...


Not unless you take the lower system as a source. That did happen on the PS2. Remember?


Yes but the PS2 was the ultimate beast at selling third party software. That hasn't been one of Nintendo's console strenght for a while now....

The main fear for Nintendo should be that the Wii2 gets assimilated to the Xbox360 and the PS3 in term of gen in the consumer mind instead of the successor of those two.

A lot of that is going to depend on when both Sony and Microsoft decide to release their next gen.

Right now seeing their software sales and the price that software is being sold at, they do not have to hurry ( one reason publisher start to want a new gen is when the average price of new titles start dropping heavilly due to the size of library and the used game market..., that hasn't happened yet)



PS3-Xbox360 gap : 1.5 millions and going up in PS3 favor !

PS3-Wii gap : 20 millions and going down !

Soriku said:
Play4Fun said:
  • Nintendo is thinking about launching Zelda: Skyward Sword around the same time as Wii 2 since Wii 2 is backwards compatible with Wii 1 games.  They want to follow the same strategy when they launched Pokemon Black/White when 3DS was coming out.


Yeahhh....no. They already confirmed the game is a 2011 release multiple times. They're not going to delay it another 1.5 plus years.

Why 1.5 plus years? Does Wii 2 is going to release December 31st 2012 and Zelda SS is set for just after the E3? Delay would be anything from three to ten months... and I remember well TP being dead set for April '06...

 



 

 

 

 

 

Ail said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Ail said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Munkeh111 said:
superchunk said:
Munkeh111 said:
 

Well it's minimum power will be PS360 level, so the easy thing to do for devs will be to take those games

But I think we all know that Sony and M$ will blow Nintendo out of the water in terms of power


I disagree.

You need to read my other Nintendo thread (see link in sig), but MSony have learned a valuable lesson about $600 consoles that sell for a loss vs $250 systems that sell for a profit and are marginal upgrades from last gen.

MSony will only show a 5-6x performance increase over this gen as compared to the 10-15x they saw against last gen. They will want to launch around $400 max with a profitable or near profitable system (no $200plus loss per item).

They won't want to wait 3 or more years to begin making a profit on the hardware. They will want to be at that level immediately or within its first year.

Well they will almost certainly not be out until 2013, so that will make easier to beat Nintendo in a power perspective


Not significantly. That's the point.

Yeah power is becoming irrelevant as I doubt most publishers will invest the amount of money needed to max the new consoles.

A more relevant issue is going to be things like the amount of RAM available on those new machines.

Because if one comes out with 512Mb and the others with 1gb that is going to make multiplatform development a bigger pain...


Not unless you take the lower system as a source. That did happen on the PS2. Remember?


Yes but the PS2 was the ultimate beast at selling third party software. That hasn't been one of Nintendo's console strenght for a while now....

The main fear for Nintendo should be that the Wii2 gets assimilated to the Xbox360 and the PS3 in term of gen in the consumer mind instead of the successor of those two.

A lot of that is going to depend on when both Sony and Microsoft decide to release their next gen.

Right now seeing their software sales and the price that software is being sold at, they do not have to hurry ( one reason publisher start to want a new gen is when the average price of new titles start dropping heavilly due to the size of library and the used game market..., that hasn't happened yet)


1. No, the third party games that sell a hell of a lot haven't been on Nintendo systems for a while (scraps don't count). There is a difference. They refused to put the games on the Wii in the first place, and then claimed no one was buying them (I was there. They said the games couldn't come out for a year, and didn't even wait six months to claim third party games weren't selling). Don't blame the consumers for not buying what isn't available to buy.

2. That is true. Giving into third party demands is not a good idea until third parties can stop making their games increasingly hemogeneous, and rely on cut scenes over great level design.

3. If third parties drop this system for those, then Nintendo will at least know to let them go to hell and stop trying to court people who wouldn't really support them unless they had no choice.

4. Most publishers, yes. But some some people at Ubisoft have echoed the whining of some developers that the specs aren't good enough anymore. They want more powerful systems.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

pikmin!



LordTheNightKnight said:
Ail said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Ail said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Munkeh111 said:
superchunk said:
Munkeh111 said:
 

Well it's minimum power will be PS360 level, so the easy thing to do for devs will be to take those games

But I think we all know that Sony and M$ will blow Nintendo out of the water in terms of power


I disagree.

You need to read my other Nintendo thread (see link in sig), but MSony have learned a valuable lesson about $600 consoles that sell for a loss vs $250 systems that sell for a profit and are marginal upgrades from last gen.

MSony will only show a 5-6x performance increase over this gen as compared to the 10-15x they saw against last gen. They will want to launch around $400 max with a profitable or near profitable system (no $200plus loss per item).

They won't want to wait 3 or more years to begin making a profit on the hardware. They will want to be at that level immediately or within its first year.

Well they will almost certainly not be out until 2013, so that will make easier to beat Nintendo in a power perspective


Not significantly. That's the point.

Yeah power is becoming irrelevant as I doubt most publishers will invest the amount of money needed to max the new consoles.

A more relevant issue is going to be things like the amount of RAM available on those new machines.

Because if one comes out with 512Mb and the others with 1gb that is going to make multiplatform development a bigger pain...


Not unless you take the lower system as a source. That did happen on the PS2. Remember?


Yes but the PS2 was the ultimate beast at selling third party software. That hasn't been one of Nintendo's console strenght for a while now....

The main fear for Nintendo should be that the Wii2 gets assimilated to the Xbox360 and the PS3 in term of gen in the consumer mind instead of the successor of those two.

A lot of that is going to depend on when both Sony and Microsoft decide to release their next gen.

Right now seeing their software sales and the price that software is being sold at, they do not have to hurry ( one reason publisher start to want a new gen is when the average price of new titles start dropping heavilly due to the size of library and the used game market..., that hasn't happened yet)


1. No, the third party games that sell a hell of a lot haven't been on Nintendo systems for a while (scraps don't count). There is a difference. They refused to put the games on the Wii in the first place, and then claimed no one was buying them (I was there. They said the games couldn't come out for a year, and didn't even wait six months to claim third party games weren't selling). Don't blame the consumers for not buying what isn't available to buy.

2. That is true. Giving into third party demands is not a good idea until third parties can stop making their games increasingly hemogeneous, and rely on cut scenes over great level design.

3. If third parties drop this system for those, then Nintendo will at least know to let them go to hell and stop trying to court people who wouldn't really support them unless they had no choice.

4. Most publishers, yes. But some some people at Ubisoft have echoed the whining of some developers that the specs aren't good enough anymore. They want more powerful systems.


for your 4), i'm definitly convinced that there are plenty of developers out there that would like to play with more powerfull hardware. The question is how many publishers are willing to pay for that. And how much consumers are willing to pay for a little better graphics. ( because even if those new machine can do a lot better graphics, this is going to be expensive...).

Maybe  I don't represent the majority but I really saw the need for a gen after the PS2. However at this time I am quite happy with what the PS3 can provide and I don't really feel like better graphics would make my gaming experience any better ( Heavy Rain totally drew me in without the need for better graphics for example and I don't feel like better graphics is what would improve Assassin's Creed at this point..)

 

I think the key thing in the end is going to have to be the new IPs. We are so used to the way the current franchise look like that we don't really feel the need for graphical improvements and it's really new franchise that sold us on the HD gen ( for those of us non Wii users). So it was stuff like Assassin's creed, Gears, Uncharted, Heavy Rain,...



PS3-Xbox360 gap : 1.5 millions and going up in PS3 favor !

PS3-Wii gap : 20 millions and going down !