This was a good post. Even though you think there's no information, it shows you're trying to make a connection. However, I can assure you that none exists as far as I know, though you only have my word to take on it.

Oh, forgot to mention one thing in my quoting Heph's post. I am Town! There ya go. Blatant lie or honest truth, you decide.

In a bit of a rush here as I'm only on a lunch break. I'll be back later to do as I promised,(vote someone) so please DO NOT hammer the no lynch until then.

@hatmoza/j0:
Can we get some completely updated votals?

Indeed they don't, and if Heph is town then it certainly wouldn't this time either. I'm leaving out the obvious, since it's obvious.

I would say that the non underlined part is the implication; implying that if Heph is town, a "one-of-them-is-scum" thought process would not end well [because I'm town]. Hence, being "obvious".

Other than that, I wouldn't say it's anything special. I mean, I'd say it's somewhat redundant. THAT might give me pause, as I believe that redundancy springs from paranoia....but, IIRC you are normally very clear, if not brief, and while I'd say it's normal behavior for you, I wouldn't exactly say it's normal town behavior.

L-3 No Lynch: *Stan *Baalz *hat*vett

L-5 Vetteman: *Wonk*prof

L-6 Linkzmax: *F-F

with 13 votes, 7 is the majority

Edited to update

Also, prof, mind putting "unvote _____" everytime you change votes too? Makes it easier to keep track. Right now it's no biggie, but when everybody's voting it gets cluttered. 

As I see it there are a couple options.

We can no lynch. This will give time for the lurkers to finish whatever it is that is currently occupying them, give some information, and possibly reinvigorate those out there with power roles. The downside is that we waste a lynch.

We can train on a lurker. This will give incentive for people to play, create discussion, and take advantage of a chance to lynch a mafia. It will also further eventually get to night and have all the benefits of the above.

Other than that, the only people I see as lurking are trash, vette, and stefl.

So, to honor both your request that noone hammer the no lynch, and my own opinions about how day 1 should go, I'm going to:

vote: vette

furthermore, Vette, IIRC you are normally for day 1 lynch. Correct? Why are you being so cautious about linkz, when he is in no danger of being lynched?

sorry, 

unvote

vote: vette

is that a quote?

Why does that make you sad?
I believe you said that complexity makes it a harder decision to lynch on day 1. 

So, you are sad that a day 1 won't happen?

Yes it's from the flavor text. I was citing the portion of the text that made me come to this conclusion.

Ah, that's a cleverly cutting remark, then.