By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Child Of Eden: Move & 3D Confirmed

ethomaz on 13 April 2011

The game always was multiplataform... the only news is the Move and 3D support for PS3.

Kinect support is already confirmed since E3 last year.

And 3D for 360 I will check.



Around the Network
AussieGecko on 13 April 2011

@ethomaz

Kinect wasnt announced I dont think but a few months ago move support was certainly announced. People like me were clearly wrong when we said it wouldnt be. None the less, 3D as it stands still might be new.

 



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

ethomaz on 13 April 2011
AussieGecko said:

@ethomaz

Kinect wasnt announced I dont think but a few months ago move support was certainly announced. People like me were clearly wrong when we said it wouldnt be. None the less, 3D as it stands still might be new.

 

There was a rumor early this moth about Move support... now it's confirmed by Ubisoft... so official.



Acevil on 13 April 2011

Really sucks, that no chance in hell will I get to enjoy the 3D gaming that sony is providing. (NOT BUYING A 3D TV)



 

Silver-Tiger on 13 April 2011

This on 3D, with the Move light and the actual gameplay will be a real killer trip for people smoking grass. :D



updated: 14.01.2012

playing right now: Xenoblade Chronicles

Hype-o-meter, from least to most hyped:  the Last Story, Twisted Metal, Mass Effect 3, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Playstation ViTA

bet with Mordred11 that Rage will look better on Xbox 360.

Around the Network
AussieGecko on 14 April 2011
ethomaz said:
AussieGecko said:

@ethomaz

Kinect wasnt announced I dont think but a few months ago move support was certainly announced. People like me were clearly wrong when we said it wouldnt be. None the less, 3D as it stands still might be new.

 

There was a rumor early this moth about Move support... now it's confirmed by Ubisoft... so official.

hahaha fair enough I think we took it as official lol



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

binary solo on 14 April 2011

Interesting. I wouldn't have thought there was much of an advantage in this game having a short period of exclusivity. Still I suppose if 5 people buy a 360 for this over PS3 because it's out on 360 first it's 5 extra 360 (and Kinect) sales for MS and 5 less PS3 (and Move) sales for Sony.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Reasonable on 14 April 2011
binary solo said:

Interesting. I wouldn't have thought there was much of an advantage in this game having a short period of exclusivity. Still I suppose if 5 people buy a 360 for this over PS3 because it's out on 360 first it's 5 extra 360 (and Kinect) sales for MS and 5 less PS3 (and Move) sales for Sony.


I reckon the value of timed must be zero here.  I'm surprised that MS would pay for it as hinted in the comment unless they meant something else.

I don't see this selling systems which means owners will go with the platform they already have whatever the launch date.  I suppose it might sway some multi-console owners but in my experience most multi-console owners already have a preference for one reason or another and again a short delay won't change that.

Given the relatively late notification of Move I wonder if the delay is simply that 360/Kinect will be ready 4 to 6 weeks ahead of PS3/Move version.  Although the comment does mention a financial reason.

If MS thinks this is how to hang on to US lead I think they've lost the plot a bit.  I can understand them paying to get 30 days CoD map packs first - not that I condone it, I don't - but this seems pointless if it is a bought timed period.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

ElGranCabeza on 14 April 2011

This game is to be played by people when they're stoned out of their mind.



kitler53 on 14 April 2011
kowenicki said:
Reasonable said:
binary solo said:

Interesting. I wouldn't have thought there was much of an advantage in this game having a short period of exclusivity. Still I suppose if 5 people buy a 360 for this over PS3 because it's out on 360 first it's 5 extra 360 (and Kinect) sales for MS and 5 less PS3 (and Move) sales for Sony.


I reckon the value of timed must be zero here.  I'm surprised that MS would pay for it as hinted in the comment unless they meant something else.

I don't see this selling systems which means owners will go with the platform they already have whatever the launch date.  I suppose it might sway some multi-console owners but in my experience most multi-console owners already have a preference for one reason or another and again a short delay won't change that.

Given the relatively late notification of Move I wonder if the delay is simply that 360/Kinect will be ready 4 to 6 weeks ahead of PS3/Move version.  Although the comment does mention a financial reason.

If MS thinks this is how to hang on to US lead I think they've lost the plot a bit.  I can understand them paying to get 30 days CoD map packs first - not that I condone it, I don't - but this seems pointless if it is a bought timed period.


people are jumping to conclusions...  as usual.

as are you ...