By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - NoA announces Q2 lineup for Wii, DS and 3DS.

Seece said:

Yay, moreintonagro, I'm impressed (somewhat) with you.

Who is moreintonagro?

It's just I can't stand it, I got amazingly pissed off by this Wii line-up, they didn't put any efford into making it better, and trying to protect it with such low excuses as "making us save money" is lame.

So I'll just use my shield excuse that their E3 will be phenomenal



Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight said:
morenoingrato said:


It is still no excuse, Sony is making the NGP, and are still having some pretty great PS3 games on the near future.

And the cost thing is BS, the games costed considerably less than many others, and sell 20 million .... I don't know how it doesn't turn into mass profit.


How is Sony's situation proof of Nintendo's? Not only are they are larger company, they didn't release a new system, and Nintendo has.

Plus making lots of money doesn't mean making lots of games. That can cause saturation, and thin out the talent. Look at EA.

The 3DS, in all likelyhood, used up talent resources to make both the system and the first waves of games. The next wave of Wii games is likely coming, but the work on the other system caused this gap. You can't buy Miyamoto and co. into being in two places at once.


As far as I'm concerned, EA has done plenty of games this year, and their games don't sell nearly as good as Nintendo's.

And even if Sony haven't released a new game system, it is in development, and they still have a great line-up that extends as far as 2012.



morenoingrato said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
morenoingrato said:


It is still no excuse, Sony is making the NGP, and are still having some pretty great PS3 games on the near future.

And the cost thing is BS, the games costed considerably less than many others, and sell 20 million .... I don't know how it doesn't turn into mass profit.


How is Sony's situation proof of Nintendo's? Not only are they are larger company, they didn't release a new system, and Nintendo has.

Plus making lots of money doesn't mean making lots of games. That can cause saturation, and thin out the talent. Look at EA.

The 3DS, in all likelyhood, used up talent resources to make both the system and the first waves of games. The next wave of Wii games is likely coming, but the work on the other system caused this gap. You can't buy Miyamoto and co. into being in two places at once.


As far as I'm concerned, EA has done plenty of games this year, and their games don't sell nearly as good as Nintendo's.

And even if Sony haven't released a new game system, it is in development, and they still have a great line-up that extends as far as 2012.


What part of that did you miss? If Sony can make more games, that is because they have more people, not because they are equivalent to Nintendo, but magically more productive.

As for EA, their games not selling as well is the point. Again, saturation and thinning out.

Sure it would be nice if there was a situation where Nintendo could release a constant stream of games, but they don't have as many people as you think.

Now you could blame a misallocation of their talent causing the gap, but assuming they are just as comparable to larger companies, or to assume that the money they make can magically make the same amount of people work twice as hard, is ridiculous.

In short, you have a right to not like the lineup, but not the facts about why it happened, as they are fallacious. Hate the lineup because they planned poorly, not because they didn't supposedly spend enough of the money they made.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

miz1q2w3e said:
IamAwsome said:

How are they the biggest videogame publisher on earth. Amount of money made =/= size of the company. They don't have that many studios and they are launching the 3DS. Sony on the other hand has 14 studios,  and focuses most of their attention to the PS3.  Microsoft has even less studios than Nintendo, and is their lineup stacked? The main reason that their game lineup isn't the best is because their studios are busy with the 3DS.

Hence my initial question, Where's all the money going? Not to building new development studios that's for sure. The size of their development force is nowhere near proportional to the size of their revenue - Strange isn't it?

If anything,the money is going into new, unannounced games (E3?) or development for the Wii2.



LordTheNightKnight said:
morenoingrato said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
morenoingrato said:


It is still no excuse, Sony is making the NGP, and are still having some pretty great PS3 games on the near future.

And the cost thing is BS, the games costed considerably less than many others, and sell 20 million .... I don't know how it doesn't turn into mass profit.


How is Sony's situation proof of Nintendo's? Not only are they are larger company, they didn't release a new system, and Nintendo has.

Plus making lots of money doesn't mean making lots of games. That can cause saturation, and thin out the talent. Look at EA.

The 3DS, in all likelyhood, used up talent resources to make both the system and the first waves of games. The next wave of Wii games is likely coming, but the work on the other system caused this gap. You can't buy Miyamoto and co. into being in two places at once.


As far as I'm concerned, EA has done plenty of games this year, and their games don't sell nearly as good as Nintendo's.

And even if Sony haven't released a new game system, it is in development, and they still have a great line-up that extends as far as 2012.


What part of that did you miss? If Sony can make more games, that is because they have more people, not because they are equivalent to Nintendo, but magically more productive.

As for EA, their games not selling as well is the point. Again, saturation and thinning out.

Sure it would be nice if there was a situation where Nintendo could release a constant stream of games, but they don't have as many people as you think.

Now you could blame a misallocation of their talent causing the gap, but assuming they are just as comparable to larger companies, or to assume that the money they make can magically make the same amount of people work twice as hard, is ridiculous.

In short, you have a right to not like the lineup, but not the facts about why it happened, as they are fallacious. Hate the lineup because they planned poorly, not because they didn't supposedly spend enough of the money they made.


But that's not my point, EA games don't sell as well, but they keep releasing a constant flow of games, good-ish ones in fact.

And show me some proof of your claim Nintendo studios aren't big, that is just silly, you're saying that with so many years of many games Nitendo has a small studio? Do you even know how many divisions they have?



Around the Network
Nintendogamer said:
Seece said:
Nintendogamer said:
Seece said:

LOL the most LOL excuse I've ever seen for a quiet period. You don't see me pulling the same BS when it comes to MS. No, I just admit they don't give a fuck and they're doing it all wrong.

Set yourself free and see the light, you'll feel better!!


If I did the same with N you 'll be making fun of me still.

No I wouldn't.

Yes you would, you would say something like " What's the matter? Nintendo upsetting you ;)".  If I complained like Moreningrato did you'de laugh at me.

You would never say that though. It's either stuff like this, or annoying ridiculous doom and gloom predictions, because some random annoynomous person on N4G said wii is doomed ...

Why can't you just take things for face value?



 

Seece said:
Nintendogamer said:
Seece said:
Nintendogamer said:
Seece said:

LOL the most LOL excuse I've ever seen for a quiet period. You don't see me pulling the same BS when it comes to MS. No, I just admit they don't give a fuck and they're doing it all wrong.

Set yourself free and see the light, you'll feel better!!


If I did the same with N you 'll be making fun of me still.

No I wouldn't.

Yes you would, you would say something like " What's the matter? Nintendo upsetting you ;)".  If I complained like Moreningrato did you'de laugh at me.

You would never say that though. It's either stuff like this, or annoying ridiculous doom and gloom predictions, because some random annoynomous person on N4G said wii is doomed ...

Why can't you just take things for face value?


Even if I do that you will still and throw water in my face ( metaphorically).



Buying in 2015: Captain toad: treasure tracker,

mario maker

new 3ds

yoshi woolly world

zelda U

majora's mask 3d

When you support two consoles one almost completely by yourself sooner or later you are going to run out of great games some bit of time. Not to mention during times of transition. They can only do so much and keep up the quality we are used to recieving form Nintendo. Though they probably could space them out a bit better.



Nintendogamer said:

Even if I do that you will still and throw water in my face ( metaphorically).

bah who cares about Seece or what he has to say anywho - He's just a big ol meanie is what he is



Nintendogamer said:
Seece said:

You would never say that though. It's either stuff like this, or annoying ridiculous doom and gloom predictions, because some random annoynomous person on N4G said wii is doomed ...

Why can't you just take things for face value?


Even if I do that you will still and throw water in my face ( metaphorically).

How do you know until you try? Stop thinking I'm purposley out to get you, beyond flattering yourself there fella. I respond the some of the absurd posts you make. And you make a lot, so I guess I should forgive you for thinking I'm against you.