Super monkey ballz sucking for the Wii board totally pissed me off. 

I think that was the begining of the end for me and buying software for the Wii.

Sounds like you  envy hd consoles because of all the great 3rd party support they get. 

Sarcastic or not, this is true and I dont complain at all...  

I don't get your point with the "similar list could be made for every console manufacture." So what? You can't talk about a specific bias against a specific console manufacture? Please... don't be silly.

By the way, may I remind you that the title of this thread is anti-Nintendo biased developers, not a "bias in gaming development" thread.

Sounds more likely you didn't notice that I was refering to DS and 3DS as well. Nice try, anyway.

Sure thing ;)

My point is that your treating these developers and publishers as if they are 'anti' Nintendo, when in reality they just have no reason to develop for the platform, they don't have the resources or they have legitimate business practices that they have chosen to follow and they just happen to not involve Nintendo.

Your treating this as if it is a specific case that only involves Nintendo, when it's just a standard business practice and your making it out to be something negative.

Yes, they are anti-Nintendo. They not only have, apparently, no reasons, resources or different business practices not not support Nintendo, they also bash, in an unfriendly way, and create false conceptions about Nintendo products. If I should follow your logic, then I should consider Valve and Blizzard as anti-Nintendo because they have completely different business practices and don't support Nintendo at all, but I don't. Why? Because they don't bash it or don't give questionable reasons for not support Nintendo like, for example, Epic, who said 3DS can't run Unreal Engine 3. Or Infinity Ward who said COD4 couldn't be done on Wii for, year later, Treyarch, a way lesser competent developer, be able to do it. It's fine for them if they don't want to develop for Nintendo, after all they are free, but don't act like it's because "they can't do" and when in reality they don't want to do it.

No, it's a misunderstanding from you to believe I was treating this case as it was only involving Nintendo. It happen with everyone, but I wanted to talk specifically about Nintendo. And yes, public bashing and false conception of platforms it's definetively something negative.

This.

Some developers were just pissed that Nintendo didn't give them another platform to port onto to make more money.

The only company I would be comfortable in really calling Anti-Nintendo is Epic. They suck and their philosophy is basically the opposite of Nintendo's.

I'm sure Nintendo will make a move to cater a little more to 3RD parties next gen, like they did with 3DS.

Mistwalker is an independent studio. They develop games for hire and, as far as I know, they don't control any of the IPs they created. They worked for Microsoft in the past by their latest game, The Last Story, was for Nintendo.