Nsanity said:
LivingMetal said:
ethomaz said:
RolStoppable said:
In the other thread that got locked I already pointed out that the 360 number is missing one quarter of its shipment data. What I didn't notice is that the same goes for the Wii. Only the PS3 has its calendar Q4 2010 data included. This sure is one credible analysis.
|
No. The numbers are not missing quarters... the numbers are active base.
Just active consoles count... broke consoles (RROD?) not count.
So makes sense PS3 was over 360 now... because the failure hate of PS3 is so much less than 360...
|
No, I think the failure hate is quite high for the PS3. Just look as some of the users on this site who constantly hate on the PS3.
|
No, I think the failure hate is quite higher for the 360. Just look as some of the users on this site who constantly hate on the 360.
|
You should probably reply back to ethomaz, he explained what the article was saying and you shot him down without even reading the article and probably misinterpreting his post. You seem to do that a lot, make a cheap one liner implying that the poster is wrong or biased and then when that poster makes a reasonable and logical argument, you disappear and then repeat the same role over again in a different thread.
The only posters you seem to argue against are guys that go overboard and have baseless arguments (like osamaobama), maybe you should try and be a better poster and run with the argument your trying to make next time against more reasonable posters.
Your article posts are much appreciated though.
OT: Unless they had direct contact with Microsoft, I doubt they would have been able to get a decent grasp of the failure rate numbers. If they used network data to get the results (PSN, LIve) then the article is completely ridiculous.