By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TruckOSaurus said:

I'm not sure what you're implying here. Correct me if I'm wrong:

You're saying that the Mafia had a chance to exchange their names/roles at the beginning of Day One (which has been common recently), that someone other than radish said "I'm a Sibling, my brother is X" and then radish slipped by using sentences that implied he knew someone in the town was a sibling. And now you want the sibling to sacrifice himself so we can kill the Mafia member by killing his brother?

Yes, that is what I am saying, which was followed by "in the off chance that it's true".

I appreciate that your wording makes my idea seem volatile, but it's pretty simple. 

1. They knew each other's roles (which is pretty common)
2. Possibly knew who the town sibling was
3. There IS a sibling pair
4. a mislynch is worth a dead mafia

It's not that crazy.

However, I'm not asking the sibling to sacrifice himself. I don't think a town sibling SHOULD know who their counterpart is and they shouldn't even know that they themselves are a sibling because that's gimping the mafia. It doesn't make sense to me because if I knew I was a sibling I'd sac myself on day one.



Around the Network
TruckOSaurus said:

Here's someone who could counter Gnizmo's "name equals alignment" theory. Wonk admitted to being Archimonde yesterday and like Metal_Gear said that's a very evil person!


I hada brilliant post typed up that was eaten by the website. I missed this but it is so beautiful. I thought it a problem until I started typing up a response. Archimonde the defliler is the head of the Burning Legion faction (more or less) and thus would fill the Godfather role that has been thrown about as a thought. He would thusly be shown innocent on investigation, and readily throw his name around without fear of consequences. Kel-thuzad would be working for him. Give me one dead lurker and I can hand you a mob boss!



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

Well I'm looking up my character to see if the alignment matches



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
A Bad Clown said:

To linkz: If you can answer this are you familiar with the World of Warcrafts characters?

I have played Warcraft II and III along with expansions, as well as WoW up to Burning Crusade. I am quite familiar with most characters.

I see now that some of you said I shouldn't have answered this, but I've already warned about this twice also.



Well vetteman says his doesn't match and neither does mine, I'm guessing linkz just chose characters he knew and assigned random roles.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
Around the Network
Vetteman94 said:

My character and alignment do not line up,  I figured that much was obvious


Not to put a fine point on it, but halfway gets you nothing at all from me. I got a mountain of cricumstantial evidence to back me up on this one, and a character name gives away very little if it is as you say. More to the point though I fear misconceptions. As an example, the Horde are good guys, not bad. Another worry is mafia lying to save their own asses.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

Linkzmax said:

I have played Warcraft II and III along with expansions, as well as WoW up to Burning Crusade. I am quite familiar with most characters.

I see now that some of you said I shouldn't have answered this, but I've already warned about this twice also.

Man I really don't know what to make of this post. Either you got really lucky and trolled the shit out of me, or I busted the game open. I guess I will have to wait and see.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

A Bad Clown said:

Well vetteman says his doesn't match and neither does mine, I'm guessing linkz just chose characters he knew and assigned random roles.


Character name then? And how do you know it doesn't match up? You JUST claimed you knew nothing of the sort like 5 posts ago.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

I'd like to point this out:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3960411

"How exactly did I push for a lynch? I haven't told anyone else to vote for him. Not even the people who see it as a bad thing to lie. The one and only [specific] person who i've told to vote is you, and that was to vote for me"

 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3959915

"Look at it this way. I push a lynch on you people start suspecting me, people defend you, people bandwagon on you with little evidence. Tonight it gives the power roles a large crowd of people to suspect instead of guessing randomly from the people that went an voted no lynch. Tomorrow it gives so much more than the average "So what did the powerroles get?"."



theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:

I'm not sure what you're implying here. Correct me if I'm wrong:

You're saying that the Mafia had a chance to exchange their names/roles at the beginning of Day One (which has been common recently), that someone other than radish said "I'm a Sibling, my brother is X" and then radish slipped by using sentences that implied he knew someone in the town was a sibling. And now you want the sibling to sacrifice himself so we can kill the Mafia member by killing his brother?

Yes, that is what I am saying, which was followed by "in the off chance that it's true".

I appreciate that your wording makes my idea seem volatile, but it's pretty simple. 

1. They knew each other's roles (which is pretty common)
2. Possibly knew who the town sibling was
3. There IS a sibling pair
4. a mislynch is worth a dead mafia

It's not that crazy.

However, I'm not asking the sibling to sacrifice himself. I don't think a town sibling SHOULD know who their counterpart is and they shouldn't even know that they themselves are a sibling because that's gimping the mafia. It doesn't make sense to me because if I knew I was a sibling I'd sac myself on day one.

I actually dont have a problem with this idea,  but is it always certain that when one sibling dies so does the other one?  Havent we had sibling roles in the past that did not follow this rule.   That would be my only objection to the idea, otherwise its favors well for us.