| theprof00 said: So asking a question of how someone feels about a given topic (albeit a question pulled out of a hat) is creating discussion, and asking a question about why someone would feel the need to ask these questions for the purpose of voting someone is reading too deeply? I'll remind you that dsis' reasoning had to do with a combination of 1 and 2. So, his reasoning is that "since he is for day 1 lynch" and "since he thinks all lies are bad", Heph can be lynched. Let me also remind you that several people answered his questions before he himself did. All were for day 1 lynch, and all against lying. So, given the situation that he knew people were for both of those things and then decided to push for Heph, don't you think it's at least coincidental? Also, is it really discussion if the end result was to vote the first person he disagreed with?
Offtopic concern with dsis: I do agree that "not reading your pm" is suspicious. In fact, it's one of the main things mafia talk about as a bane; that knowing you are mafia and knowing your teammates changes your game and makes you think differently, making it harder to blend in and keep your mates safe. That doesn't inherently make someone a mafia. But it is an underlining thought of every mafia post early on. "pretend you don't know your teammates". Whether you agree or not, doesn't make a difference to me. Just giving my opinion. |
@italicized
Yes, It sure has spawned quite a bit of discussion in this thread. ^^ I am very happy with the results
@bolded
How exactly did I push for a lynch? I haven't told anyone else to vote for him. Not even the people who see it as a bad thing to lie. The one and only [specific] person who i've told to vote is you, and that was to vote for me
I simply voted then in my very next post even made clear that my vote is anything but permanent
@ second part
Please keep up with the thread. i read my PM when I decided that it was a good time for RVS to end.
Sig thanks to Saber! :D
