By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

While I dont see the questions that dsister asked as a cause for concern or suspicion, especially as a few people have already said,  it is always brought up on the first day.  I do have a concern about the lack of reading his PM, the couple posts made by theprof outline my issues with this.

My other problem is hatmoza claim of being pro-town.  It wasnt what he said but how he worded it,  it seemed almost dramatic.  And in a way its almost like the same thing that dsister may be trying to do with his "i did not read my PM" claim.  Like he was trying to hide his alignment to certain players by blurring the lines early with this claim.



Around the Network
Hephaestos said:
NotStan said:

FoS darthdevidem01

It's rather strange he hasn't even posted in this yet! 


why just him? there's 4 afks no?

Took me ages to get on the computer and to read through the crapload of comments people put(98!) you guys have been very busy bees!

And him because he's one of the most vocal characters on forums so it is a bit suspicious that he's playing silence



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

Vetteman94 said:

While I dont see the questions that dsister asked as a cause for concern or suspicion, especially as a few people have already said,  it is always brought up on the first day.  I do have a concern about the lack of reading his PM, the couple posts made by theprof outline my issues with this.

My other problem is hatmoza claim of being pro-town.  It wasnt what he said but how he worded it,  it seemed almost dramatic.  And in a way its almost like the same thing that dsister may be trying to do with his "i did not read my PM" claim.  Like he was trying to hide his alignment to certain players by blurring the lines early with this claim.


The otheres have said hatmoza role claims day one a lot, and dsister claims that he actually read it before his question asking his 3 questions. I haven't played with hatmoza so I wouldn't have any idea how he plays though.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
TruckOSaurus said:
Baalzamon said:
hatmoza said:

Off-topic

-big sigh of relief-

The last few games I played as scum, and it was hard to avoid and direct posts to certain players as a scum, because of the risk of associating yourself with others.

I feel like a big weight has been lifted off my back now that I can post more freely.

Clearly inferring that you are not scum this game, but who in their right mind would make such a clear statement that they are on the good side...its as if you want the mafia to kill you, only they wouldn't be able to if you were a mafia member as well.

Vote: hatmoza

The underlined doesn't make sense. All hatmoza said was "I'm protown", the Mafia already knows that so that doesn't put him more at risk than any other townie.

You're right when you say this kind of post is suspicious but hatmoza has a tendancy to roleclaim on Day One and I remember him making the same kind of post after getting a pro-town role after a string of scum roles (and he was really town).

I'm not familiar with other people's tendencies as of yet ...I'm still extremely suspicious though...is he trying to take adavantage of what we see as a normal thing for him in order to trick us?  Or is he simply following his tendencies and revealing his roles.

On that note, I think I'll still keep my vote out there for a while until more information is revealed.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

A Bad Clown said:
Vetteman94 said:

While I dont see the questions that dsister asked as a cause for concern or suspicion, especially as a few people have already said,  it is always brought up on the first day.  I do have a concern about the lack of reading his PM, the couple posts made by theprof outline my issues with this.

My other problem is hatmoza claim of being pro-town.  It wasnt what he said but how he worded it,  it seemed almost dramatic.  And in a way its almost like the same thing that dsister may be trying to do with his "i did not read my PM" claim.  Like he was trying to hide his alignment to certain players by blurring the lines early with this claim.

The otheres have said hatmoza role claims day one a lot, and dsister claims that he actually read it before his question asking his 3 questions. I haven't played with hatmoza so I wouldn't have any idea how he plays though.

Yes I know that,  I have been in many Mafia games with hatmoza.  And yes he does do this on occasion. But like I said in my original post,  it was how he worded it.  it seemed dramatic, for no reason either



Around the Network
MetalGear_94 said:

Outlaw, Darth

Where are you?!?!?!??!!?!

I posted reminders to both of their walls.



Thank you for the reminder. I didn't realize that the game has started. I wouldn't have been able to post before this time anyways. I said I would be able on Monday. That's today!

 

After reading through the thread, it seems we got a good game!



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Final-Fan said:
theprof00 said:

Just to clue you in on some of my thought process, here is a paraphrased quote from a site I use:

Structure Setup

This tell can be summarised as, "the people that talk about how the game's structure might be instead of analyzing the reasons for why posts and ideas are put forth, are usually scum and possibly in a group of scum as the people the accuse.

 

I don't trust an argument about Structure when they can't even Structure their own sentences. 

Or did your paraphrasing accidentally butcher it? 

"the people that talk about the game's structure (instead of analyzing the reasons for why posts and ideas are put forth) are usually scum and sometimes co-mafia with the people they accuse."

example: dsis asks a quesion about structure. Heph answers it. Dsis uses this information to accuse Heph.

According to the above; I should keep an eye on the both of them.

Was I able to clarify it?



theprof00 said:
Final-Fan said:
theprof00 said:

Just to clue you in on some of my thought process, here is a paraphrased quote from a site I use:

Structure Setup

This tell can be summarised as, "the people that talk about how the game's structure might be instead of analyzing the reasons for why posts and ideas are put forth, are usually scum and possibly in a group of scum as the people the accuse.

 

I don't trust an argument about Structure when they can't even Structure their own sentences. 

Or did your paraphrasing accidentally butcher it? 

"the people that talk about the game's structure (instead of analyzing the reasons for why posts and ideas are put forth) are usually scum and sometimes co-mafia with the people they accuse."

example: dsis asks a quesion about structure. Heph answers it. Dsis uses this information to accuse Heph.

According to the above; I should keep an eye on the both of them.

Was I able to clarify it?

Maybe you want everybody to think that what you just said is true, when you in fact are the mafia member and want everybody to vote out innocents?



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

@theprof 

Were those metaphorical questions or questions you actually want an answer to

 

@the other people who have had a problem with Hatmoza's "I'm finally pro-town"

Every game that I remember him saying it in he turns out innocent. Of course he's like mafia 80% of the time, but that's beside the point :P



Sig thanks to Saber! :D