By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 on 30 March 2011

Addition to last post:

But you went after ABC, so I'm willing to go after you instead.

It was always my intention to go after MG first and you next. I was hoping to blend into the crowd enough to avoid attention, but since you had to go with abc, I decided to go after you.

You want to scapegoat MG? Let's do it then.



Around the Network
TruckOSaurus on 30 March 2011
theprof00 said:

Addition to last post:

But you went after ABC, so I'm willing to go after you instead.

It was always my intention to go after MG first and you next. I was hoping to blend into the crowd enough to avoid attention, but since you had to go with abc, I decided to go after you.

You want to scapegoat MG? Let's do it then.

I went after A Bad Clown because he bought into your worthless parenting theory.

Where did you get that I was looking to scapegoat MG? I only explained why my attacks on him weren't fully commited.



Signature goes here!

theprof00 on 30 March 2011
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

Addition to last post:

But you went after ABC, so I'm willing to go after you instead.

It was always my intention to go after MG first and you next. I was hoping to blend into the crowd enough to avoid attention, but since you had to go with abc, I decided to go after you.

You want to scapegoat MG? Let's do it then.

I went after A Bad Clown because he bought into your worthless parenting theory.

Where did you get that I was looking to scapegoat MG? I only explained why my attacks on him weren't fully commited.


the parenting theory is worthless I agree. Everything else, is not. 

The parenting theory was only a vague feeling I was getting. When ABC pointed out those links I saw much more. His words weren't very fitting, but the links (well, the first link at least) he showed were much more telling

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3970012

;bringing confusion into my idea, and saying, "let's give notstan a chance to clarify". I mean, what was he going to clarify? That he was town?

So, from that point I decided to see what else you might have undermined, and then found so many that I decided to call into view every one of your posts.

 



TruckOSaurus on 30 March 2011
theprof00 said:

Addition to last post:

But you went after ABC, so I'm willing to go after you instead.

It was always my intention to go after MG first and you next. I was hoping to blend into the crowd enough to avoid attention, but since you had to go with abc, I decided to go after you.

You want to scapegoat MG? Let's do it then.

I don't believe you think MG is the Serial Killer because if you really did believe it then you'd be lynching him right now (however convinced you are of my scuminess) since it reduces the number of deaths per night.



Signature goes here!

theprof00 on 30 March 2011
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

Addition to last post:

But you went after ABC, so I'm willing to go after you instead.

It was always my intention to go after MG first and you next. I was hoping to blend into the crowd enough to avoid attention, but since you had to go with abc, I decided to go after you.

You want to scapegoat MG? Let's do it then.

I don't believe you think MG is the Serial Killer because if you really did believe it then you'd be lynching him right now (however convinced you are of my scuminess) since it reduces the number of deaths per night.

It is actually exactly what I said at the beginning of the day.

Do you want me to post a recap?

Seems everyone needs help following the events of the day. Wonk asked me for potals and hasn't yet commented on them.



Around the Network
TruckOSaurus on 30 March 2011
theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

Addition to last post:

But you went after ABC, so I'm willing to go after you instead.

It was always my intention to go after MG first and you next. I was hoping to blend into the crowd enough to avoid attention, but since you had to go with abc, I decided to go after you.

You want to scapegoat MG? Let's do it then.

I don't believe you think MG is the Serial Killer because if you really did believe it then you'd be lynching him right now (however convinced you are of my scuminess) since it reduces the number of deaths per night.

It is actually exactly what I said at the beginning of the day.

So what? What has changed during the day that makes lynching a (supposed) Mafia member more important than lynching a Serial Killer?



Signature goes here!

theprof00 on 30 March 2011
theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

Yaknow, I'm just gunna vote MG

I think he's the SK, can't say for sure, but I'm pretty confident.

I also think that there might only be one mafia left.

 

Vote: MG

What points you to SK more than Mafia for MetalGear? Do you think he had reasons to want Gnizmo dead?

because, like I said earlier, it seems like a lot of the people who turned up scum were looking to lynch MG. I believe notstan tried to push a lynch for him, as well as dsis.

I think maybe they pushed for MG because they thought he was a lynchable target, not because he was mafia, but because he was suspicious to them. Maybe I'm not explaining correctly... if there is an SK and a scum, it makes sense that in this scenario, even if indirectly, scum are scumhunting for the SK, even if they don't realize it.





TruckOSaurus on 30 March 2011

^^ How does that answer my question?



Signature goes here!

theprof00 on 30 March 2011
theprof00 said:

I'm going to make my thoughts public again, just for the sake of trying to get you all to reassess the situation.

We have an SK and mafia. 2 kills.

If we can get the SK, we cut that down to one kill immediately. If there are 2 more mafia, and one of them is ABC, then we don't affect our situation at all and more of us will die.


This was immediately after ABC hit 3 votes, and I was trying to push for mg.



Baalzamon on 30 March 2011

theprof00 said:

And I'm truly very sorry that I'm being an arrogant dick. I truly am.

But, I am sick of noobs ignoring good evidence and questioning my tells, and then voting me for it, nonetheless.

I played with mg and kantor for several games, and several games ago, both of them fought with me on the "lynch all lurkers" rule. They said, "you have just as much chance to lynch a townie". Now, several games later, MG is sheepishly saying, "lynch lurkers, they are usually mafia".

It took 3 games of proving it to them before they finally "got it", despite them saying it wasn't true every game, and arguing with me about it. Now they both agree, and I'm tired of explaining how the game works to noobs.

------------------

Ok, going through posts, and working on my summary, this popped up.  Did the thought ever occur to you that mg still thinks you have as much chance to lynch a townie, but he's just saying this as a mafia tactic so the lurking townies will be voted out?



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.