Sorry for being offline for a while but my brother broke his laptop so he had to take my computer to finish up some university work.

The whole roleblocking thing from not stan could easily be setup to get me lynched, and he could of just wanted to roleblock the person the town thinks most supicious at the time, I dunno.

ABC hasn't really done anything to make me feel less suspicous, I am actually more suspicous of him now then I was before and I would vote for him, but I don't how many votes are on him right now and I don't want to accidently hammer him because I don't think we should end the day yet.

I'm going to make my thoughts public again, just for the sake of trying to get you all to reassess the situation.

We have an SK and mafia. 2 kills.

If we can get the SK, we cut that down to one kill immediately. If there are 2 more mafia, and one of them is ABC, then we don't affect our situation at all and more of us will die.

1. i'm uneasy onn MG

 1b.ABC did put dsister on the spot for the "not read PM", but he was a central part of the orange jokes..... most notably, they started when dsister (who had not yet read his PM) fosed notstan... it looks like that post you quoted is him slapping his fingers.

2. proff

3. no, you should target outlaw tonight.

4. any useful info? they'd already be out (useful as in giving up a mafiosi)

5. neither... like half the claimed names actually, but it's a good question without asking to nameclaim.

1. good

1b. possible

2. why didn't you vote for him then when I had a vote on him?

3. hard to do that without a night role

4.yeah I agree in fact there probably aren't anymore

5. this question was just thrown in actually

Guys, someone's post just made me remember something. Something similar that happened last round. Look at when Metal_Gear says that he would vote, but doesn't want to hammer. He currently is trailing me in votes, and it's between me and him so far this day. This is what I used as a mafia last round to convince someone that I couldn't vote yet, but I was considering doing it.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3919748

As you can see, another player unvoted me because I said I'd vote the other suspicious player. I was also one of two people in the spotlight, and I used this to lynch wonk. I believe Metal_Gear is trying to use the same strategy, but saying he doesn't want to hammer yet to not seem eager to hammer (which would make him suspicious). He also is doing the same thing I did and saying "Judging by todays posts I will vote for X player because they seem suspcious" without citing any evidence. Anyone else think Metal_Gear is using a "scum strategy"?

And what happens when I flip town and the mafia kills a townie and so does a SK? 3 townies in one night, and you'd be down to 6 people. If two players buddy up (like what heph and wonk are obviously doing right now) and convince someone to vote another townie, the town has no chance.