It really doesn't matter if you pick this game up for PC, 360, or Ps3 it's not a great shooter and really doesn't seem to be worth the hype.  Tech junkies on the PC may like it for the boundaries it will push on their systems, but it's gameplay is pretty weak.

what shocks me is how much crap they were talking about how amazing the PS3 version will be. 

from what I've seen from all publications, the game looks like crap on ps3.

will still get it for the ps3 

Killzone 3 imo takes lighting to a new level, especially in the jungle level. I said it before il say it again this is one of the most beautiful levels ive ever played in a game.

Killzone 3, in certain levels, is the best looking console game out there. I think it lacks in consistency though, some levels just dont look as good as others.

On topic: I hope crysis 2 performs well on ps3, it would be a big dissapointment if it doesnt atleast match the 360 version in performance. After all the things crytek have said i atleast expect a solid gaming experience.

BLOPS was screwed on that also.

It's called marketing 101. Of course they want to hype the release.

I seem to remember Crytek talking up CryEngine on the PS3 a good deal as well, which is currently looking completely unsubstantiated.

If so, expect it to perform similarly to Bulletstorm on the PS3.

Epic in particular does a lot of crap talking (most of it coming from Bleszinski) in regards to their projects. One can only guess it's a part of that "rock star" iconoclast image they seem to want to project.

^^^ i think its called lying bullcrap 101, i mean people arent that stupid, they will see the end product and say "that aint what they were talking about".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJIM2Ih9OEQ

when i saw that video i thought was running on pc, but it' s running on xbox. Perfect framerate with very strong graphics! Bravo crytec!!!!!

And here I thought you only reported MS news..

Good grafix or not, I won't be getting it.