| RolStoppable said: I'm taking note that the innovation of the Spirit Tracks entry in Zelda isn't being responded to here. The Mario Kart to consoles sold ratio doesn't really disprove that consoles sold are tied to the quality of Nintendo's flagship games, so I guess you are agreeing with me that Double Dash!! wasn't all that. Metroid Prime marks the starting point of a new series, that means it's the game that was setting the standards to which future entries are compared. The entire Metroid Prime series is consistent and doesn't show any signs of innovation. The thing with Metroid is the same as with Metroid Prime. The first entry is the exception, not the rule. How many sales numbers for Fire Emblem are recorded on VGC anyway? Besides, the DS didn't have any new entries in the series, only two remakes that were mostly about graphical changes with gameplay commands remaining the same as in the original games. The GBA version of A Link to the Past didn't outsell the SNES original either, despite coming with Four Swords. The point is that remakes shouldn't be used to judge the sales performance of a series. This topic is about Nintendo cramming ideas into established series instead of creating new IPs for them. You will notice that Nintendo's growth is based on keeping existing series intact and using new ideas in new IPs. Basically, this thread is about Nintendo using their ideas in the wrong way. |
is thread using sales of games as a metric or personal opinion because it is all over the place.
Everyday I'm hustlin'.
Wii and DS owner.








