By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Killzone 3′s Trump Card..Multiplayer

I could use this as another opportunity to list all the features removed from Killzone 2's multiplayer, but I'm not gonna.

In the end, most people "prefer" Killzone 3's multipalyer because it's actually playable for most people now thanks to the improved controls.

Though Operations is an awesome addition, I agree.  And the revamped class system makes a big difference early on.



Around the Network
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

That's not really a fair comparison, given Warzone incorporates five different modes that are usually standalone in other games.

Granted, in Killzone 2, we actually had the ability to play those modes individually, given it offered fully customizable servers, unlike Killzone 3.



BenVTrigger said:
Wagram said:
BenVTrigger said:

Yes the multiplayer is Fantastic and easily the BEST of anything available on PS3.

And for the record KZ3's graphics aren't that mindblowing for the first couple hours.  Just wait till you hit the Helghast Jungle though....OMG its easily the most technically incredible level ever done on a home console, by a pretty large margin.

EDIT: and for the record just noticed his comparison to Halo Reach in the article.  Sorry and no offense to PS3 only owners but while KZ3 is the best shooter I've ever played on the PS3 its multiplayer isn't even close to Halo.  Not even remotley at all. 

As a person who has played all Killzones and Halos (barring Reach) i'm on the opposite side of you. While I really enjoyed Halo 3. There is just nothing on the Halo side that even remotely interests me like Killzone.

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

While I agree that others may enjoy that stuff. I don't give a damn what reviewers or the others think. It's what I think and that's what matters to me :)



nightsurge said:

 

As for multiplayer, it was really fun.  It's very much like Battlefield Bad Company 2.


Really, Bad Company 2! I think it's time for me to get this game.



BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.



"Defeating a sandwich, only makes it tastier." - Virginia

Around the Network
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.


And your right and I would never argue that. Counter strike is the premier proving ground for shooters, but that doesn't apply to consoles last I checked.  I never made the Halo camparison the article in the OP did and I just responded.  And killzone 3 fucking rules your right.  The campaign and multiplayer have both blown me away.

What's your point?



BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.


And your right and I would never argue that. Counter strike is the premier proving ground for shooters, but that doesn't apply to consoles last I checked.  I never made the Halo camparison the article in the OP did and I just responded.  And killzone 3 fucking rules your right.  The campaign and multiplayer have both blown me away.

What's your point?


i guess my point was was it really necassary to bring halo reach into this thread and say killzones MP is mediocre compared to halos?



"Defeating a sandwich, only makes it tastier." - Virginia

Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.


And your right and I would never argue that. Counter strike is the premier proving ground for shooters, but that doesn't apply to consoles last I checked.  I never made the Halo camparison the article in the OP did and I just responded.  And killzone 3 fucking rules your right.  The campaign and multiplayer have both blown me away.

What's your point?


i guess my point was was it really necassary to bring halo reach into this thread and say killzones MP is mediocre compared to halos?

The OP made the direct comparison and said that KZ3 has better multiplayer than Halo Reach.  I simply responded to that statment which is 100% on topic and relevant to the thread.  Im perfectly allowed to express my opinions on both since they are compared to one another in the OP and I've played a crap load of both.

In KZ3 I've already put over 6 hours into the multiplayer and have my Sniper class 60% upgraded.  Here's my stats.

http://www.killzone.com/kz3/en_US/mykillzone/overview.html?name=br00tal_ben

and in Halo Reach I've already put in countless hours and played the heck out of every sinlge game mode and here's my stats for that as well.

http://www.bungie.net/stats/reach/default.aspx?player=br00tal ben

Given that I have so much experience with both games I think my opion is very relevant.



BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.


And your right and I would never argue that. Counter strike is the premier proving ground for shooters, but that doesn't apply to consoles last I checked.  I never made the Halo camparison the article in the OP did and I just responded.  And killzone 3 fucking rules your right.  The campaign and multiplayer have both blown me away.

What's your point?


i guess my point was was it really necassary to bring halo reach into this thread and say killzones MP is mediocre compared to halos?

The OP made the direct comparison and said that KZ3 has better multiplayer than Halo Reach.  I simply responded to that statment which is 100% on topic and relevant to the thread.  Im perfectly allowed to express my opinions on both since they are compared to one another in the OP and I've played a crap load of both.

In KZ3 I've already put over 6 hours into the multiplayer and have my Sniper class 60% upgraded.  Here's my stats.

http://www.killzone.com/kz3/en_US/mykillzone/overview.html?name=br00tal_ben

and in Halo Reach I've already put in countless hours and played the heck out of every sinlge game mode and here's my stats for that as well.

http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Reach/Default.aspx?player=br00tal ben&sg=0

Given that I have so much experience with both games I think my opion is very relevant.

Wait they compared the two in the OP whoops sorry about that then, I should finish reading the OP next time i comment lulz.



"Defeating a sandwich, only makes it tastier." - Virginia

BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.


And your right and I would never argue that. Counter strike is the premier proving ground for shooters, but that doesn't apply to consoles last I checked.  I never made the Halo camparison the article in the OP did and I just responded.  And killzone 3 fucking rules your right.  The campaign and multiplayer have both blown me away.

What's your point?


i guess my point was was it really necassary to bring halo reach into this thread and say killzones MP is mediocre compared to halos?

The OP made the direct comparison and said that KZ3 has better multiplayer than Halo Reach. 


Um, it said that KZ3 had better graphics and than Reach. It never said KZ3 is better than Reach