By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:
Chroniczaaa said:
BenVTrigger said:

Reviews and actual players back me up though.  While there will always be minoritys that enjoy certain games over others, I don't see how you can even compare KZ3's level of multiplayer to Halo.  I mean their in totally seperate realms of depth and sheer content and playability.  And I've played alot of both.  KZ3 has only 3 modes, and very limited upgradable classes.  Its fun and amazing, but miles behind still when in comparison to Halo. 

There's a reason that all pro gamers in MLG and stuff strive to be good at Halo, its the true proving ground in terms of multiplayer on consoles.

Oh i see what you did there, ok... and i don't see how anyone can compare any kind of multiplayer to counter-strike as that is basically the ultimate proving ground of all multiplayer of all time especially to its Gun Game which is miles ahead and more fun than anything on consoles and a community that will never die and multiple tournaments a year back me up with that.

Back to the thread. Killzone 3 is fucking awesome.


And your right and I would never argue that. Counter strike is the premier proving ground for shooters, but that doesn't apply to consoles last I checked.  I never made the Halo camparison the article in the OP did and I just responded.  And killzone 3 fucking rules your right.  The campaign and multiplayer have both blown me away.

What's your point?


i guess my point was was it really necassary to bring halo reach into this thread and say killzones MP is mediocre compared to halos?

The OP made the direct comparison and said that KZ3 has better multiplayer than Halo Reach. 


Um, it said that KZ3 had better graphics and than Reach. It never said KZ3 is better than Reach