I didn't comment on the "slip" you mentioned, I commented on your approach and then on you saying I didn't listen.

In any case if you want to have discutions without me, you should wait for the night to come ^^

It's barely an exaggeration, though.  Seriously, last round really sucked to mod...

1) Please explain this to me.  Why is it "safer" to assume that there is a higher number?

3) That's what I'm asking though.  Why do you "think that radish seems to play better right now"?  What specifically has he done/not done to make you think that?

5) Any thoughts for me on this one yet?

Okay, the game seems to be slowing down a bit, so I'd like to take this time to start focusing our attention on who, if anyone, we're going to lynch today.  The following is a list of actual votes (underlined) and preferred votes.  I'm leaving off any vote that was a joke/placeholder.

ABC: noname, trash, radish, republic, stefl, ff

wonk: heph

heph: wonk

prof was stuck between "wonk,heph, and trashleg."   ABC gave a criteria, but no specifics. Linkz seems to have returned to undecided.  No one is dead set on a No Lynch.  A casual glance at the above list shows that ABC is currently the prime lynch candidate, although some players have expressed reservations about his scumminess.

My next post will be a brief summary of our collective suspicions, as I understand them.  I am likely to have missed something, so please chime in if you spot an omission.

-Suspicions on A Bad Clown:  He has been consistently unable to give a satisfying explanation for his actions.  He justified his initial suspicion of me by claiming he did not know we could unvote, notwithstanding that several players had done so, and that he has played forum mafia before.  He joked around with me after I voted him, but later implicitly claimed he thought the joke vote was serious.  He suspected heph and trash, but dropped his suspicions not because of any explanation that they gave, but because they became more active.  He has consistently explained his actions by referring to things that would not occur for several hours.  He stopped responding to me because I made a big post, but the effort I put into it makes him think I'm a townie. 

-Suspicions on wonk:  He pushed a lynch on radish very early in the game, despite not personally thinking radish was scum. Made a post before this proposal in which he noted that two players were already suspicious of radish.  This was shortly after we'd stopped joking around.  He has repeatedly emphasized that he was not pushing a lynch on radish, but instead a lynch on the weakest player, who happened to be radish, in lieu of a no-lynch.  Again, this was essentially when the game had just begun.  Notwithstanding that caveat, he did not do any serious scum-hunting until heph repeatedly got on his case, at which point he voted for heph.  Interactions with radish could be interpreted as telling a fellow scum to shape up and improve.  Responded to a radish post with a smiley, to indicate radish's play has improved, but has since insisted that radish still sucks.  Gave ABC a pass when ABC displayed some poor logic.  Has not followed through on a promise to look at ABC more closely.  Possible revenge vote on heph.

-Suspicions on theRepublic:  Predecessor trangentspree showed up, said that some things had 'caught his eye' without bothering to expand on that, promised to appear the next day (his free day), then disappeared into the void.  Republic himself jumped on stefl for stefl's implicit assumption that there are three mafia in this game, and even said this was worthy of a vote if ABC wasn't around, but then he himself made a post in which he also assumed that there are three mafia in this game.  Has not responded to that fact, despite last logging in nine hours ago.

-Suspicions on stefl:  Has been extremely passive this game.  Has one of the smallest post totals, and has so far primarily (exclusively?) posted to answer questions directed at him.  Posted that he was more than happy to answer any questions sent to him, but  AFAIK he has not contributed any original thoughts so far or taken the initiative.  Made a post in which he assumed that this game has three mafia.

From here, I'm going to need you guys to fill in more blanks for me, since I haven't been part of the following discussion and thus am not as familiar with it.

-Suspicions on heph:  Possible buddying with trash, and has jumped in unsolicited to defend trash from prof's interrogation.  Requested a time limit once attention started to fall on him and trash.  Trash did something similar around that time.   Possible buddying with ABC as well.  Voted to lynch wonk partly based on his suspicions of radish.

-Suspicions on trash:  Possible buddying with heph.  Has written that she hates being the focus of attention, and that she would soil herself if she thought she was acting suspicious.

Correction: linkz' primary is now heph.

just quoting so youknow i am paying attention, i'll be back online properly in like 2 hours ok? sorry for the mad runaround. i'll be up late tonight tho so no worries.

That's right. And though trash is an HoS while Wonk is only an FoS, I think my suspicions of her are too linked to the ones I have of Heph. Wonk would be my second choice for a lynch.

Last night I was quite hesitant to vote for Heph, but since then I think my fears have been allayed. I'm going to go back through the thread now, so in my next post I'll explain that as well as reiterate things you missed in your summary or bring up any new points that have yet to be mentioned.

Because he then has higher odds of hitting scum

4) you're kidding right?

here's a post of you quoting my response to your first one.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3916918

the second one of your posts is this:

do you really expect a reply on this?

here: it's not sarcasm, we do have verbose happy players (me included) and I do think it makes the game more interesting. If you were refering to the secon part, then yeah i'm joking (:-p and lolz should indicate it) cause I found it absurd to even say I talked a lot to her as I talked just as much if not more to noname at the same time.

that's not a reply I found of interest to post, but here it is ^^

5) I have nothing to object here, he was indeed not cooperating (and pushing your buttons a bit too).

6) I miss expressed myself it seems. If I could prove the reasons why you altered your gameplay, then I would vote for you. Evidently, you haven't produced much, one of the uppoints of your style is that you are a bit hidden behing your questions.