theprof00 said:
1. well, if you insulted me, it would pretty much guarantee that you are mafia since both people who did last game ended up being mafia. 2. I didn't continue because ff pretty much summed up my own points about the situation. I hadn't looked at all the posts one after another to see the trend. Now, I did notice radish defending you, saying that he had been doing the same as you, which wasn't actually true. This defense is what initially made me think that you could both be mafia. 3. As far as how long it took me to talk about this, I was content with Linkz line of investigation and decided that I should be looking into other people while he pursue you. 4. Also, participating more does not equate to playing better. What you wanted him to do, was participate more IMO. 5. AND IMO those two different motivations come from two different camps. |
1. Glad to see that. It's still stupid though :P
2. I'm not sure where is defence of me came from I don't particularly like it and don't really think it's part of him playing better(now since all of you will think this is me trying to hint at getting him to stop I'll just say it clearly. Radish stop having any posts that say in wonk's defence) If radish gets me killed by defending me after I was proposing an option that would take him out for playing badly. I hope we all find the humor in that.
3. What about when even he said he really didn't think he nailed me?
4. I agree they are not the same. However participating more is a way to get a player to play better. The more he posts the more room for feedback there is. I want him to play better (I want everyone to really) and this could have lead to that is many different ways.
5. why are they different? Why would someone only want someone to play more but not better? wouldn't even scum want another scum to play better?